Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28231182›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Overview on the General Approaches to Improve Gluten-Free Pasta and Bread.

Lucia Padalino, Amalia Conte, Matteo Alessandro Del Nobile

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucia PadalinoUniversity of Foggia, Services Center of Applied Research-Via Napoli, Foggia 25 71122, Italy. lucia.padalino@unifg.it.
Amalia ConteUniversity of Foggia, Services Center of Applied Research-Via Napoli, Foggia 25 71122, Italy. amalia.conte@unifg.it.
Matteo Alessandro Del NobileUniversity of Foggia, Services Center of Applied Research-Via Napoli, Foggia 25 71122, Italy. matteo.delnobile@unifg.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of gluten-free products is increasing since a growing number of people are suffering from celiac disease and thereby need gluten-free diet. Gluten is responsible for the visco-elastic characteristics of wheat-based products; therefore, its lack makes the gluten-free products not similar to wheat-based product, with scarce textural properties. This reason constitutes the major industrial limitation. Thus, obtaining good-quality gluten-free products represents a technological challenge. This review reports the main strategies adopted to produce high quality gluten-free pasta and bread. They are mainly obtained by the utilization of specific ingredients (hydrocolloids, proteins or enzymes) to be incorporated into the standard formulation or the adoption of proper technological variables that can enhance above all the functional properties, the texture and the taste.

Indexed as

breadenzymesextrusion-cookinggluten-free foodhydrocolloidspastaproteinsstarchstarch gelatinization

Identifiers

PMID28231182
PMCPMC5302439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.