Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27662814›Full record

ArticleClinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry2016

Interlaboratory analytical comparison of fatty acid concentrations in serum or plasma.

Michele M Schantz, Carissa D Powers, Rosemary L Schleicher, Joseph M Betz, Stephen A Wise

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Essential fatty acid deficiency in parenteral nutrition: Historical perspective and modern solutions, a narrative review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michele M SchantzChemical Sciences Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA. Electronic address: Michele.schantz@nist.gov.
Carissa D PowersNutritional Biomarkers Branch/Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Rosemary L SchleicherNutritional Biomarkers Branch/Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Joseph M BetzOffice of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Stephen A WiseChemical Sciences Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA; Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · USNational Institutes of Health · USOffice of Dietary Supplements · US

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are a large number of clinical studies focusing on the measurement of individual fatty acids in serum or plasma; however, few studies have focused on the interlaboratory comparisons of these measurements. The National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST), in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements (NIH-ODS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has initiated a quality assurance program for assessing and improving the comparability of individual fatty acid measurements in serum and plasma.

methodsThis is a performance-based study so participants are encouraged to use their laboratory's methods for the quantification of the individual fatty acids that they typically measure in the unknown serum or plasma samples along with a control material. The control materials used to date are SRM 1950 Metabolites in Human Plasma and SRM 2378 Fatty Acids in Frozen Human Serum.

resultsTo date, two studies of the Fatty Acid Quality Assurance Program (FAQAP) have been completed with 11 and 14 participants, respectively. The agreement among the laboratories for individual fatty acids was within 20% for 70% of the data submitted. Laboratories were also requested to run triplicate analyses for each unknown sample. The precision of the individual laboratory data was generally good, with relative standard deviations <20%.

conclusionsThe results from the first two exercises indicate the need for additional assessment of the comparability among laboratories doing these measurements. Future studies will be conducted with the goals of increasing the number of participating laboratories, increasing awareness of the need to use control materials, and improving the comparability among laboratories.

Indexed as

Blood Chemical AnalysisAdultFatty AcidsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedFatty AcidsFatty acidsInterlaboratory studyPlasmaSerumSRM 1950SRM 2378

Identifiers

PMID27662814
PMCPMC5201108
OpenAlexW2522329881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.