Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27580609›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2016

Dorsal anterior cingulate and ventromedial prefrontal cortex have inverse roles in both foraging and economic choice.

Amitai Shenhav, Mark A Straccia, Matthew M Botvinick, Jonathan D Cohen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Generalized Encoding of the Relative Subjective Value of Cognitive Effort in the Dorsal ACC.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Neural evidence of switch processes during semantic and phonetic foraging in human memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Dissecting the neurocomputational bases of patch-switching.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rat Anterior Cingulate Cortex Continuously Signals Decision Variables in a Patch Foraging Task.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Advances in modeling learning and decision-making in neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  19. Neuro-Computational Foundations of Moral Preferences.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amitai ShenhavPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA. amitai_shenhav@brown.edu.
Mark A StracciaPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Matthew M BotvinickPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Jonathan D CohenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has highlighted a distinction between sequential foraging choices and traditional economic choices between simultaneously presented options. This was partly motivated by observations in Kolling, Behrens, Mars, and Rushworth, Science, 336(6077), 95-98 (2012) (hereafter, KBMR) that these choice types are subserved by different circuits, with dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC) preferentially involved in foraging and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) preferentially involved in economic choice. To support this account, KBMR used fMRI to scan human subjects making either a foraging choice (between exploiting a current offer or swapping for potentially better rewards) or an economic choice (between two reward-probability pairs). This study found that dACC better tracked values pertaining to foraging, whereas vmPFC better tracked values pertaining to economic choice. We recently showed that dACC's role in these foraging choices is better described by the difficulty of choosing than by foraging value, when correcting for choice biases and testing a sufficiently broad set of foraging values (Shenhav, Straccia, Cohen, & Botvinick Nature Neuroscience, 17(9), 1249-1254, 2014). Here, we extend these findings in 3 ways. First, we replicate our original finding with a larger sample and a task modified to address remaining methodological gaps between our previous experiments and that of KBMR. Second, we show that dACC activity is best accounted for by choice difficulty alone (rather than in combination with foraging value) during both foraging and economic choices. Third, we show that patterns of vmPFC activity, inverted relative to dACC, also suggest a common function across both choice types. Overall, we conclude that both regions are similarly engaged by foraging-like and economic choice.

Indexed as

Appetitive BehaviorBrain MappingChoice BehaviorExecutive FunctionFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansLogistic ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMathematical ConceptsNeuropsychological TestsPrefrontal CortexRewardVisual PerceptionYoung Adultcognitive controldecision-makingprefrontal cortexreward

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.