Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27481937›Full record

SynthesisClinical rehabilitation2017

A systematic review of high quality randomized controlled trials investigating motor skill programmes for children with developmental coordination disorder.

Nick Preston, Sara Magallón, Liam Jb Hill, Elizabeth Andrews, Sara M Ahern, Mark Mon-Williams

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04176159 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Experimental Research Study About the Effectiveness of a Physiotherapy Program Based on Motor Imagery and Task-oriented Training in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorDavid Moreno NayaRan2019 to 2026Enrolled99ConditionsDevelopmental Coordination DisorderArmsMOTOR IMAGERY AND TASK-ORIENTED TRAINING
NCT05936372 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Study Protocol to Examine the Effects of Acute Exercise on Motor Learning and Brain Activity in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder (ExLe-Brain-DCD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Nacional d'Educacio Fisica de CatalunyaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsDevelopmental Coordination DisorderArmsAcute intense aerobic exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Occupational Therapy for Children With DCD and Academic Difficulties: A Pan-Canadian Survey.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nick Preston1 School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sara Magallón1 School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Liam Jb Hill1 School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Elizabeth Andrews3 Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Sara M Ahern3 Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Mark Mon-Williams1 School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Bradford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify effective motor training interventions for children with developmental coordination disorder from research graded as high quality (using objective criteria) for the purpose of informing evidence-based clinical practice. DATA SOURCES: We followed the guidance for conducting systematic reviews issued by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Six OvidSP electronic databases (AMED, All EBM reviews (including Cochrane), Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PsychARTICLES Full Text, PsycINFO) were searched systematically. We aimed to retain only randomized control trials and systematic reviews of randomized control trials, defined as the highest level of evidence by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. We searched reference lists of retained articles to identify further appropriate articles. REVIEW

methodsTwo reviewers critically appraised and categorized articles by effect size (including confidence intervals), inclusion of power calculations and quality using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Only studies scoring seven or more on the PEDro scale (classed by the PEDro as high reliability) were retained.

resultsNo systematic reviews met our criteria for inclusion from 846 articles yielded by the systematic search. Nine randomized control trials investigating 15 interventions to improve motor skills met our inclusion criteria for 'high quality'. Nevertheless, not all included studies were adequately powered for determining an effect.

conclusionLarge effect sizes associated with 95 % confidence intervals suggest that 'Neuromotor Task Training', 'Task-oriented Motor Training' and 'Motor Imagery + Task Practice Training' are the most effective reported interventions for improving motor skills in children with developmental coordination disorder.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationPhysical Therapy ModalitiesChildChild, PreschoolEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleMotor Skills DisordersPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexTask Performance and AnalysisTreatment OutcomeDevelopmental coordination disordermotor impairmentmotor skill programmesrandomized control trialsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27481937
PMCPMC5482383
OpenAlexW2489503083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.