ArticlePloS one2016
Characterising the Canine Oral Microbiome by Direct Sequencing of Reverse-Transcribed rRNA Molecules.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- The bacterial microbiota in first-void urine from men with and without idiopathic urethritis.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Canine Tooth Microbiome Gingival Index: a new microbiome-derived measure of gingival health validated by nutritional intervention.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Impact of fresh and fermented vegetable consumption on gut microbiota and body composition: insights from diverse data analysis approaches.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Revealing microbial community characteristics in healthy human, cat and canine salivas and looking for species-specific microbes.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Article
- The gut microbiota of healthy individuals remains resilient in response to the consumption of various dietary fibers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Does Catheter Insertion Site Matter? Contamination of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters during Dental Scaling in Dogs.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Exploring the resilience and stability of a defined human gut microbiota consortium: An isothermal microcalorimetric study.MicrobiologyOpen · 2024Article
- Metaproteomics reveals parallel utilization of colonic mucin glycans and dietary fibers by the human gut microbiota.iScience · 2024Article
- Short-term pectin-enriched smoothie consumption has beneficial effects on the gut microbiota of low-fiber consumers.FEMS microbes · 2024Article
- A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral Tumors.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Microbial Dynamics of Kombucha Consortia upon Continuous Backslopping in Coffee and Orange Juice.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Metagenomic Analysis of DNA Viruses with Targeted Sequence Capture of Canine Lobular Orbital Adenomas and Normal Conjunctiva.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Absolute quantification of viable bacteria abundances in food by next-generation sequencing: Quantitative NGS of viable microbes.Current research in food science · 2023Article
- Isolation of Oral Bacteria, Measurement of the C-Reactive Protein, and Blood Clinical Parameters in Dogs with Oral Tumor.Veterinary medicine international · 2023Article
- Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Centenarians and Young People: Impact of Eating Habits and Childhood Living Environment.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Optimisation of sample storage and DNA extraction for human gut microbiota studies.BMC microbiology · 2021Article
- The dysbiosis of ovine foot microbiome during the development and treatment of contagious ovine digital dermatitis.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
- Influence of the dental topical application of a nisin-biogel in the oral microbiome of dogs: a pilot study.PeerJ · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PCR amplification and sequencing of phylogenetic markers, primarily Small Sub-Unit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) genes, has been the paradigm for defining the taxonomic composition of microbiomes. However, 'universal' SSU rRNA gene PCR primer sets are likely to miss much of the diversity therein. We sequenced a library comprising purified and reverse-transcribed SSU rRNA (RT-SSU rRNA) molecules from the canine oral microbiome and compared it to a general bacterial 16S rRNA gene PCR amplicon library generated from the same biological sample. In addition, we have developed BIONmeta, a novel, open-source, computer package for the processing and taxonomic classification of the randomly fragmented RT-SSU rRNA reads produced. Direct RT-SSU rRNA sequencing revealed that 16S rRNA molecules belonging to the bacterial phyla Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Spirochaetes, were most abundant in the canine oral microbiome (92.5% of total bacterial SSU rRNA). The direct rRNA sequencing approach detected greater taxonomic diversity (1 additional phylum, 2 classes, 1 order, 10 families and 61 genera) when compared with general bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons from the same sample, simultaneously provided SSU rRNA gene inventories of Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya, and detected significant numbers of sequences not recognised by 'universal' primer sets. Proteobacteria and Spirochaetes were found to be under-represented by PCR-based analysis of the microbiome, and this was due to primer mismatches and taxon-specific variations in amplification efficiency, validated by qPCR analysis of 16S rRNA amplicons from a mock community. This demonstrated the veracity of direct RT-SSU rRNA sequencing for molecular microbial ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.