Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27240673›Full record

Trial reportCardiovascular drugs and therapy2016

Efficacy and Safety of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in Patients with Mixed Hyperlipidemia.

Robert S Rosenson, Terry A Jacobson, David Preiss, C Stephen Djedjos, Ricardo Dent, Ian Bridges, Michael Miller

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert S RosensonMount Sinai Heart, Cardiometabolics Unit, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, MC1 Level, New York, NY, 10029, USA. robert.rosenson@mssm.edu.
Terry A JacobsonEmory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
David PreissClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Oxford University, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
C Stephen DjedjosAmgen Inc., One Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
Ricardo DentAmgen (Europe) GmbH, Dammstrasse 23, 6300, Zug, Switzerland.
Ian BridgesAmgen Ltd, 240 Cambridge Science Park, Milton, Cambridge, CB4 0WD, UK.
Michael MillerUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W Baltimore St, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvolocumab significantly reduces low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C); we investigated its effects on LDL-C lowering in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

methodsWe compared the efficacy and safety of evolocumab in hypercholesterolemic patients selected from the phase 2 and 3 trials who had fasting triglyceride levels ≥1.7 mmol/L (150 mg/dL elevated triglycerides) and <1.7 mmol/L (without elevated triglycerides). Fasting triglyceride level ≥ 4.5 mmol/L at screening was an exclusion criterion for these studies, but post-enrollment triglyceride levels may have exceeded 4.5 mmol/L (400 mg/dL). Efficacy was evaluated in four phase 3 randomized studies (n = 1148) and safety from the phase 2 and 3 studies (n = 2246) and their open-label extension studies (n = 1698). Efficacy analyses were based on 12-week studies, while safety analyses included data from all available studies. Treatment differences were calculated vs. placebo and ezetimibe after pooling dose frequencies.

resultsMean treatment difference in percentage change from baseline in LDL-C for participants with elevated triglycerides and those without elevated triglycerides (mean of weeks 10 and 12) with evolocumab was approximately -67 % vs. placebo and -42 % vs. ezetimibe (all P < 0.001) compared to −65 % vs. placebo and −39 % vs. ezetimibe, [corrected] respectively. Treatment differences for evolocumab vs. placebo and ezetimibe followed a similar pattern for non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B. Evolocumab was well tolerated, with balanced rates of adverse events leading to discontinuation of evolocumab vs. comparator (placebo and/or ezetimibe).

conclusionThe significant reductions of atherogenic lipids including LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B seen with evolocumab are similar in patients with and without mixed hyperlipidemia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnticholesteremic AgentsApolipoproteins BCholesterolDouble-Blind MethodEzetimibeFemaleHumansHypercholesterolemiaMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnticholesteremic AgentsApolipoproteins BCholesterolevolocumabEzetimibePCSK9 InhibitorsPCSK9 protein, humanProprotein Convertase 9TriglyceridesApolipoproteinHigh-density lipoproteinLow-density lipoprotein-cholesterolProprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9Triglycerides

Identifiers

PMID27240673
PMCPMC4919379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.