Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26975338›Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2016

Transferase Activity of Lactobacillal and Bifidobacterial β-Galactosidases with Various Sugars as Galactosyl Acceptors.

Sheryl Lozel Arreola, Montira Intanon, Pairote Wongputtisin, Paul Kosma, Dietmar Haltrich, Thu-Ha Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheryl Lozel ArreolaFood Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences , Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
Montira IntanonFood Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences , Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
Pairote WongputtisinFood Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences , Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
Paul KosmaDivision of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences , Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
Dietmar HaltrichFood Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences , Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
Thu-Ha NguyenFood Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences , Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The β-galactosidases from Lactobacillus reuteri L103 (Lreuβgal), Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus DSM 20081 (Lbulβgal), and Bifidobacterium breve DSM 20281 (Bbreβgal-I and Bbreβgal-II) were investigated in detail with respect to their propensity to transfer galactosyl moieties onto lactose, its hydrolysis products D-glucose and D-galactose, and certain sugar acceptors such as N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc), N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (GalNAc), and L-fucose (Fuc) under defined, initial velocity conditions. The rate constants or partitioning ratios (kNu/kwater) determined for these different acceptors (termed nucleophiles, Nu) were used as a measure for the ability of a certain substance to act as a galactosyl acceptor of these β-galactosidases. When using Lbulβgal or Bbreβgal-II, the galactosyl transfer to GlcNAc was 6 and 10 times higher than that to lactose, respectively. With lactose and GlcNAc used in equimolar substrate concentrations, Lbulβgal and Bbreβgal-II catalyzed the formation of N-acetyl-allolactosamine with the highest yields of 41 and 24%, respectively, as calculated from the initial GlcNAc concentration.

Indexed as

AcetylgalactosamineAcetylglucosaminebeta-GalactosidaseBifidobacteriumGalactosamineGalactoseGlucosamineGlucoseLactobacillusLactoseLimosilactobacillus reuteriOligosaccharidesSubstrate SpecificityTransferasesAcetylgalactosamineAcetylglucosaminebeta-GalactosidaseGalactosamineGalactoseGlucosamineGlucoseLactoseOligosaccharidesTransferasesgalacto-oligosaccharidesgalactosyl acceptorshetero-oligosaccharidestransgalactosylationβ-galactosidases

Identifiers

PMID26975338
PMCPMC4819807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.