Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26753927›Full record

SynthesisDysphagia2016

Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scales Based on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.

Paul D Neubauer, Denise P Hersey, Steven B Leder

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dysphagia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03441932 (Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Dysphagia in Stroke Patients Based on Pharyngeal Residue Severity), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03441932 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Dysphagia in Stroke Patients Based on Pharyngeal Residue Severity: A Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaint-Joseph UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled150ConditionsDysphagia Following Cerebral InfarctionArmsFiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Deglutition disorders as a consequence of head and neck cancer therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Endoscopic arytenoid abduction lateropexy with para-arytenoid soft tissue reduction for the treatment of permanent bilateral vocal fold palsy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Analysis of swallowing and voice-related quality of life in patients after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of swallowing in children with higher grades glottic web.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Validity and reliability of the Italian translation of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul D NeubauerDepartment of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208041, New Haven, CT, USA.
Denise P HerseyCushing/Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Steven B LederDepartment of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208041, New Haven, CT, USA. steven.leder@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of pharyngeal residue severity located in the valleculae and pyriform sinuses has always been a primary goal during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Pharyngeal residue is a clinical sign of potential prandial aspiration making an accurate description of its severity an important but difficult challenge. A reliable, validated, and generalizable pharyngeal residue severity rating scale for FEES would be beneficial. A systematic review of the published English language literature since 1995 was conducted to determine the quality of existing pharyngeal residue severity rating scales based on FEES. Databases were searched using controlled vocabulary words and synonymous free text words for topics of interest (deglutition disorders, pharyngeal residue, endoscopy, videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic technology, aspiration, etc.) and outcomes of interest (scores, scales, grades, tests, FEES, etc.). Search strategies were adjusted for syntax appropriate for each database/platform. Data sources included MEDLINE (OvidSP 1946-April Week 3 2015), Embase (OvidSP 1974-2015 April 20), Scopus (Elsevier), and the unindexed material in PubMed (NLM/NIH) were searched for relevant articles. Supplementary efforts to identify studies included checking reference lists of articles retrieved. Scales were compared using qualitative properties (sample size, severity definitions, number of raters, and raters' experience and training) and psychometric analyses (randomization, intra- and inter-rater reliability, and construct validity). Seven articles describing pharyngeal residue severity rating scales met inclusion criteria. Six of seven scales had insufficient data to support their use as evidenced by methodological weaknesses with both qualitative properties and psychometric analyses. There is a need for qualitative and psychometrically reliable, validated, and generalizable pharyngeal residue severity rating scales that are anatomically specific, image-based, and easily learned by both novice and experienced clinicians. Only the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale, an anatomically defined and image-based tool, met all qualitative and psychometric criteria necessary for a valid, reliable, and generalizable vallecula and pyriform sinus severity rating scale based on FEES.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexCineradiographyDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersEsophagoscopyFiber Optic TechnologyFluoroscopyHumansPharynxDeglutition and deglutition disordersFiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowingPharyngeal residuePyriform sinus residueScalingVallecula residue

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.