Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667394›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2015

Eight years' experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study.

Melchor Sánchez-Mendiola, Daniel Morales-Castillo, Uri Torruco-García, Margarita Varela-Ruiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melchor Sánchez-MendiolaDepartment of Medical Education Research, Secretariat of Medical Education, UNAM Faculty of Medicine, Ave. Universidad 3000, México City, 04510, D.F. México, México. melchorsm@gmail.com.
Daniel Morales-CastilloDepartment of Medical Education Research, Secretariat of Medical Education, UNAM Faculty of Medicine, Ave. Universidad 3000, México City, 04510, D.F. México, México. aerodann@hotmail.com.
Uri Torruco-GarcíaDepartment of Medical Education Research, Secretariat of Medical Education, UNAM Faculty of Medicine, Ave. Universidad 3000, México City, 04510, D.F. México, México. uritorrucoedumedvih@gmail.com.
Margarita Varela-RuizDepartment of Medical Education Research, Secretariat of Medical Education, UNAM Faculty of Medicine, Ave. Universidad 3000, México City, 04510, D.F. México, México. magavarelar@yahoo.com.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA time-honored strategy for keeping up to date in medicine and improving critical appraisal skills is the Journal Club (JC). There are several reports of its use in medicine and allied health sciences but almost no reports of JC focused on medical education. The purpose of the study is to describe and evaluate an eight years' experience with a medical education Journal Club (MEJC).

methodsWe started a monthly medical education JC in 2006 at UNAM Faculty of Medicine in Mexico City. Its goal is to provide faculty with continuing professional development in medical education. A discussion guide and a published paper were sent 2 weeks before sessions. We reviewed the themes and publication types of the papers used in the sessions, and in June-July 2014 administered a retrospective post-then-pre evaluation questionnaire to current participants that had been regular attendees to the JC for more than 2 years. The retrospective post-then-pre comparisons were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Effect sizes were calculated for the pre-post comparisons with Cohen's r.

resultsThere have been 94 MEJC sessions until July 2014. Average attendance is 20 persons, a mix of clinicians, educators, psychologists and a sociologist. The articles were published in 32 different journals, and covered several medical education themes (curriculum, faculty development, educational research methodology, learning methods, assessment, residency education). 22 Attendees answered the evaluation instrument. The MEJC had a positive evaluation from good to excellent, and there was an improvement in self-reported competencies in medical education literature critical appraisal and behaviors related to the use of evidence in educational practice, with a median effect size higher than 0.5. The evaluation instrument had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.96.

conclusionsA periodic Medical Education Journal Club can improve critical appraisal of the literature, and be maintained long-term using evidence-based strategies. This activity is a useful adjunct to the scholarship of teaching.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceCommunity MedicineEducation, Medical, GraduateEvidence-Based MedicineHealth PersonnelHumansLearningMexicoPeriodicals as TopicProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationReadingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26667394
PMCPMC4678520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.