ArticleClinical and molecular allergy : CMA2015
360 degree perspective on allergic rhinitis management in Italy: a survey of GPs, pharmacists and patients.
Article in Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- ARIA-Italy managing allergic rhinitis and asthma in a changing world: The role of the Pharmacist.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025Review
- A systematic review for improper application of nasal spray in allergic rhinitis: A proposed role of community pharmacist for patient education and counseling in practical setting.Asia Pacific allergy · 2025Review
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Second-Generation Antihistamine 1 Receptor Blockers and Japanese Kampo Shoseiryuto for Treating Perennial Allergic Rhinitis in Outpatient Settings in Japan.Hospital pharmacy · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a health practitioner survey on ocular allergy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The future of allergic rhinitis management: A partnership between healthcare professionals and patients.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024Article
- The impact of implementing an allergic rhinitis clinical management pathway (AR-CMaP) in the community pharmacy.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Therapeutic management of allergic rhinitis: a survey of otolaryngology and allergology specialists.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Article
- Psychological Disorders of Patients With Allergic Rhinitis in Chengdu, China: Exploratory Research.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Current treatment strategies for seasonal allergic rhinitis: where are we heading?Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2022Review
- Closing the knowledge gap in Malaysian pharmacists: a virtual Allergic Rhinitis Boot Camp initiative.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2021Article
- Physicians' prescribing behaviour and clinical practice patterns for allergic rhinitis management in Italy.Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2020Article
- Qualitative Exploration of Pharmacists' Feedback Following the Implementation of an "Allergic Rhinitis Clinical Management Pathway (AR-CMaP)" in Australian Community Pharmacies.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Interventions Delivered in the Community Pharmacy to Manage Allergic Rhinitis- A Systematic Review of the Literature.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Dance Dance "Cultural" Revolution: Tailoring a Physical Activity Intervention for South Asian Children.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2020Article
- Primary care management of allergic rhinitis: a cross-sectional study in four ASEAN countries.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2020Article
- Next-generation ARIA care pathways for rhinitis and asthma: a model for multimorbid chronic diseases.Clinical and translational allergy · 2019Review
- Interactive Network Platform Improves Compliance and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Patients with Allergic Rhinitis.Patient preference and adherence · 2019Article
- Use of complementary medicine among patients with allergic rhinitis: an Italian nationwide survey.Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2019Article
- Insights on Allergic Rhinitis Management from a Northern Cyprus Perspective and Evaluation of the Impact of Pharmacist-Led Educational Intervention on Patients' Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs), community pharmacists and allergic rhinitis (AR) patients in Italy were surveyed in order to gain insight from all three perspectives into the diagnosis, management and burden of AR in Italy.
methodsGeneral practitioners and pharmacists (n = 100 for each) were surveyed by telephone; questions related to overall practice and to last AR patient seen. Patients (n = 552) completed a questionnaire after visiting specialist allergy centres. Questions related to diagnosis and treatment, degree of everyday limitation from AR, and satisfaction with treatment. The data were analysed descriptively.
resultsAllergic rhinitis was managed mainly by GPs, who reported making the diagnosis themselves in 68 % of cases; rhinorrhea (64 %), sneezing (57 %) and congestion (49 %) were the symptoms most frequently taken into account. Limitation from AR on everyday life was rated 6.2 out of 10 by GPs. Pharmacists most often considered eye tearing (54 %) in their diagnosis. Almost half of GPs (49 %) and 87 % of pharmacists were unaware of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines. The most commonly reported prescribed treatments by GPs were branded mometasone furoate, desloratadine, ebastine and generic mometasone; 21 % prescribed homeopathic products occasionally. On average, GPs remembered that their last patient case had moderate/severe disease, was prescribed anti-histamine monotherapy (37 % of cases), and did not change prescription (78 %). Pharmacists recommended an antihistamine for 56 % of clients who asked for advice, and a nasal decongestant for 21 %. Patients rated limitation from AR on everyday life as 5.7/10. 55 % reported using multiple therapies, and 43 % were not satisfied or weakly satisfied with their current treatment. Patients' main expectation for the future was to succeed in managing their AR symptoms (45 %), while 22 % hoped for a definitive cure. Many patients (61 %) were concerned their health would deteriorate.
conclusionsAllergic rhinitis is largely managed by GPs in Italy, with pharmacists also playing a role, yet awareness of the ARIA guidelines among these groups is low. Patient satisfaction with treatment is moderate or low. New more effective treatments are needed to improve AR management in Italy. Allergy education programs need to be better targeted to GPs and pharmacists, and communication with patients regarding symptom control must be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.