Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26473644›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2015

A Prognostic Model to Predict Mortality among Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients in the U.S. Military Health System.

Jie Lin, Corey A Carter, Katherine A McGlynn, Shelia H Zahm, Joel A Nations, William F Anderson, Craig D Shriver, Kangmin Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cancers · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Cancer: A Review for Clinicians.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Structural and functional radiomics for lung cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jie Lin*John P. Murtha Cancer Center, and †Department of Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland; ‡Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland; and Departments of §Surgery and ‖Preventative Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Corey A Carter
Katherine A McGlynn
Shelia H Zahm
Joel A Nations
William F Anderson
Craig D Shriver
Kangmin Zhu

Funding

Studies of Rare CancersZIACP010158 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MCGLYNN, KATHERINE · 2009 to 2025
$19.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccurate prognosis assessment after non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosis is an essential step for making effective clinical decisions. This study is aimed to develop a prediction model with routinely available variables to assess prognosis in patients with NSCLC in the U.S. Military Health System.

methodsWe used the linked database from the Department of Defense's Central Cancer Registry and the Military Health System Data Repository. The data set was randomly and equally split into a training set to guide model development and a testing set to validate the model prediction. Stepwise Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival. Model performance was assessed by calculating area under the receiver operating curves and construction of calibration plots. A simple risk scoring system was developed to aid quick risk score calculation and risk estimation for NSCLC clinical management.

resultsThe study subjects were 5054 patients diagnosed with NSCLC between 1998 and 2007. Age, sex, tobacco use, tumor stage, histology, surgery, chemotherapy, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus were identified as significant predictors of survival. Calibration showed high agreement between predicted and observed event rates. The area under the receiver operating curves reached 0.841, 0.849, 0.848, and 0.838 during 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively.

conclusionsThis is the first NSCLC prognosis model for quick risk assessment within the Military Health System. After external validation, the model can be translated into clinical use both as a web-based tool and through mobile applications easily accessible to physicians, patients, and researchers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelModels, StatisticalPrognosisRiskSurvival AnalysisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26473644
PMCPMC4695230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.