ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2015
A Prognostic Model to Predict Mortality among Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients in the U.S. Military Health System.
Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Decision support systems for incurable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Pooled it
- Article
- MilCanEpi: Increased Capability for Cancer Care Research in the Department of Defense.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Article
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Cancer: A Review for Clinicians.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2022Article
- Treatment strategy, overall survival and associated risk factors among patients with unresectable stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer in China (2015-2017): A multicentre prospective study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022Article
- Predicting 2-year survival in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: the development and validation of a scoring system from an Australian cohort.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Structural and functional radiomics for lung cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Review
- Long-Term Survival of Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer over Five Decades.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Comorbidity and stage at diagnosis among lung cancer patients in the US military health system.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2020Article
- Trans-omics biomarker model improves prognostic prediction accuracy for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.Aging · 2019Article
- Article
- Physician Empathy Interacts with Breaking Bad News in Predicting Lung Cancer and Pleural Mesothelioma Patient Survival: Timing May Be Crucial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2018Article
- Metformin use and survival after non-small cell lung cancer: A cohort study in the US Military health system.International journal of cancer · 2017Article
- Metformin use and its effect on survival in diabetic patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2016 · on this mapObservational
- External validation of a prognostic model for mortality among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer using the Veterans Precision Oncology Data Commons.Seminars in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAccurate prognosis assessment after non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosis is an essential step for making effective clinical decisions. This study is aimed to develop a prediction model with routinely available variables to assess prognosis in patients with NSCLC in the U.S. Military Health System.
methodsWe used the linked database from the Department of Defense's Central Cancer Registry and the Military Health System Data Repository. The data set was randomly and equally split into a training set to guide model development and a testing set to validate the model prediction. Stepwise Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival. Model performance was assessed by calculating area under the receiver operating curves and construction of calibration plots. A simple risk scoring system was developed to aid quick risk score calculation and risk estimation for NSCLC clinical management.
resultsThe study subjects were 5054 patients diagnosed with NSCLC between 1998 and 2007. Age, sex, tobacco use, tumor stage, histology, surgery, chemotherapy, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus were identified as significant predictors of survival. Calibration showed high agreement between predicted and observed event rates. The area under the receiver operating curves reached 0.841, 0.849, 0.848, and 0.838 during 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively.
conclusionsThis is the first NSCLC prognosis model for quick risk assessment within the Military Health System. After external validation, the model can be translated into clinical use both as a web-based tool and through mobile applications easily accessible to physicians, patients, and researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.