Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25349179›Full record

Trial reportClinical trials (London, England)2015

Recruitment and retention of urban schoolchildren into a randomized double-blind vitamin D supplementation trial.

Jennifer M Sacheck, Maria I Van Rompay, Elizabeth M Olson, Virginia R Chomitz, Elizabeth Goodman, Catherine M Gordon, Misha Eliasziw, Michael F Holick, Christina D Economos

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical trials (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Investigation of the C-3-epi-25(OH)DApplied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer M SacheckFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA jennifer.sacheck@tufts.edu.
Maria I Van RompayFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth M OlsonFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Virginia R ChomitzDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth GoodmanMassGeneral Hospital for Children and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Catherine M GordonDivisions of Adolescent Medicine and Endocrinology, Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Misha EliasziwDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael F HolickBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Christina D EconomosFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Impact of vitamin D supplementation on cardiometabolic risk in schoolchildrenR01HL106160 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SACHECK, JENNIFER · 2011 to 2014
$3.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL106160NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL106160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile rarely used for supplementation trials in the United States, schools present a practical alternative to a clinical setting. PURPOSE: We describe the successful recruitment and retention of urban schoolchildren into a 6-month randomized, double-blind vitamin D3 supplementation trial.

methodsBoston-area urban schoolchildren, aged 8-15 years, were recruited in 2011-2012 through classroom and auditorium presentations. Informed consent forms in five languages were sent home to parents. Retention methods included regular telephone calls and gift cards for completed study visits.

resultsIn total, 691 schoolchildren enrolled. Their mean (standard deviation) age was 11.7 (1.4) years; 59% were racial/ethnic minorities and 68% qualified for free or reduced-price school meals. Multi-level, culturally sensitive, creative approaches contributed to success in recruitment and retention. Of 691 participants, 81% completed the 6-month intervention period. Reasons for attrition included missed appointments and fear of a blood draw. More children from households with higher incomes were retained than those from households with lower incomes (85% vs 79%, respectively, P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: The need for three fasting blood draws over the 6-month supplementation period was a limiting factor in the recruitment and retention of children in this study.

conclusionRecruitment of urban children into a school-based randomized controlled trial represents a feasible approach for a supplementation study. Particular attention to children of lower socioeconomic status may enhance participation and retention when conducting intervention studies among diverse populations.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdolescentBostonChildDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsSocioeconomic FactorsUrban PopulationVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamin Dchildrenrandomized controlled trialRecruitmentretentionschool-based interventionvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID25349179
PMCPMC4344912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.