Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23607935›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2013

Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement: an fMRI study of the testing effect.

Erik A Wing, Elizabeth J Marsh, Roberto Cabeza

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05585892 (Randomised Cross-over Study on the Effectiveness of Elaboration and Proactive Feedback as Part of Formative Key Feature Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05585892 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Randomised Cross-over Study on the Effectiveness of Elaboration and Proactive Feedback as Part of Formative Key Feature Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GoettingenRan2018 to 2019Enrolled143ConditionsMedical EducationArmsElaboration and individual mailed feedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cortisol suppression impairs retrieval of emotional memory and changes its neural correlates immediately and four days post-treatment.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Dopamine Enhances Item Novelty Detection via Hippocampal and Associative Recall via Left Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The testing effect for visual materials depends on preexisting knowledge.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2023
    Article
  10. Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ocular measures during associative learning predict recall accuracy.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Age-Related Decreases in the Retrieval Practice Effect Directly Relate to Changes in Alpha-Beta Oscillations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erik A WingDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Box 90086, 417 Chapel Drive, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. United States; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Box 90999, B203 Levine Science Research Center, Durham, NC 27708. United States. Electronic address: erik.wing@duke.edu.
Elizabeth J Marsh
Roberto Cabeza

Funding

Effects of Aging on Episodic Memory Retrieval: Neuroimaging StudiesR56AG023770 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CABEZA, ROBERTO · 2010 to 2010
$346k
NIA NIH HHS R56 AG023770NIA NIH HHS R56AG23770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restudying material is a common method for learning new information, but not necessarily an effective one. Research on the testing effect shows that practice involving retrieval from memory can facilitate later memory in contrast to passive restudy. Despite extensive behavioral work, the brain processes that make retrieval an effective learning strategy remain unclear. In the present experiment, we explored how initially retrieving items affected memory a day later as compared to a condition involving traditional restudy. In contrast to restudy, initial testing that contributed to future memory success was associated with engagement of several regions including the anterior hippocampus, lateral temporal cortices, and medial prefrontal cortex (PFC). Additionally, testing enhanced hippocampal connectivity with ventrolateral PFC and midline regions. These findings indicate that the testing effect may be contingent on processes that are typically thought to support memory success at encoding (e.g. relational binding, selection and elaboration of semantically-related information) in addition to those more often associated with retrieval (e.g. memory search).

Indexed as

Brain MappingHippocampusHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemoryMental RecallNeural PathwaysPrefrontal CortexTemporal LobeEpisodic memoryfMRIHippocampusMedial PFCRetrieval practiceTesting effect

Identifiers

PMID23607935
PMCPMC3932674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.