Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23592738›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2013

The interactions of dietary tomato powder and soy germ on prostate carcinogenesis in the TRAMP model.

Krystle E Zuniga, Steven K Clinton, John W Erdman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krystle E ZunigaDivision of Nutritional Sciences and Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 905 S. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Steven K Clinton
John W Erdman
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · US

Funding

Tomatoes, Lycopene, and Prostate Carcinogenesis in MiceR01CA125384 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ERDMAN, JOHN W · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
Novel Combinations of Foods Targeting Prostate Cancer PreventionF31CA153804 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ZUNIGA, KRYSTLE ERIN · 2011 to 2012
$78k
NCI NIH HHS 1 F31 CA153804-01A1NCI NIH HHS 1-R01 CA125384NCI NIH HHS F31 CA153804NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interactions between bioactive-rich food components within a complex human diet for the inhibition of prostate carcinogenesis are largely unknown and difficult to quantify in humans. Tomato and soy products have each shown anti-prostate cancer (PCa) activity in laboratory studies. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of dietary tomato and soy germ, alone and in combination, for the inhibition of PCa in the transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) model. At 4 weeks of age, male C57BL/6 × FVB TRAMP mice (n = 119) were randomized to consume: AIN-93G control, 10% whole tomato powder (TP), 2% soy germ powder (SG), or 10% tomato powder with 2% soy germ powder (TP+SG) for 14 weeks. One hundred percent of mice fed the control diet had PCa, whereas PCa incidence was significantly lower in mice consuming TP (61%, P < 0.001), SG (66%, P < 0.001), and TP+SG (45%, P < 0.001). Although the protection offered by the combination of TP and SG was not synergistic, it was the most effective intervention. TP, SG, and TP+SG increased apoptotic index (AI) and modestly reduced the proliferative index (PI) in the prostate epithelium of TRAMP mice exhibiting primarily prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. The dramatic reduction in the PI/AI ratio by the dietary interventions suggests that the control mice experience a stronger stimulus for malignant progression in the prostate microenvironment. Maximally effective and safe strategies for PCa prevention may result from optimizing combinations of nutrients and bioactives through an orchestration of dietary patterns.

Indexed as

DietGlycine maxSolanum lycopersicumAdenocarcinomaAnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionDrug SynergismEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Avascular endothelial growth factor A, mouse

Identifiers

PMID23592738
PMCPMC3681090
OpenAlexW2143707420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.