Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23583307›Full record

ReviewProgress in neurobiology

Brain development in rodents and humans: Identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species.

Bridgette D Semple, Klas Blomgren, Kayleen Gimlin, Donna M Ferriero, Linda J Noble-Haeusslein

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in neurobiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,151 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,151citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
83.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,151 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2,071 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Animal stroke models and outcome evaluation: A review.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. TH/TRs-COL11A2 Axis Mediates Loss of a Differentiated Astrocyte State in Hypogyrified Brains.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,091 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bridgette D SempleDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0112, USA. bridgette.semple@ucsf.edu
Klas Blomgren
Kayleen Gimlin
Donna M Ferriero
Linda J Noble-Haeusslein
University of California, San Francisco · USNeurological Surgery · USUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

Trauma to Developing Brain-Injury and Repair MechanismsR01NS050159 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NOBLE, LINDA J. · 2005 to 2013
$2.8M
Determinants of vulnerability and recovery after trauma to the developing brainR01NS077767 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NOBLE, LINDA J. · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS NS077767NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050159NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS077767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoxic-ischemic and traumatic brain injuries are leading causes of long-term mortality and disability in infants and children. Although several preclinical models using rodents of different ages have been developed, species differences in the timing of key brain maturation events can render comparisons of vulnerability and regenerative capacities difficult to interpret. Traditional models of developmental brain injury have utilized rodents at postnatal day 7-10 as being roughly equivalent to a term human infant, based historically on the measurement of post-mortem brain weights during the 1970s. Here we will examine fundamental brain development processes that occur in both rodents and humans, to delineate a comparable time course of postnatal brain development across species. We consider the timing of neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, gliogenesis, oligodendrocyte maturation and age-dependent behaviors that coincide with developmentally regulated molecular and biochemical changes. In general, while the time scale is considerably different, the sequence of key events in brain maturation is largely consistent between humans and rodents. Further, there are distinct parallels in regional vulnerability as well as functional consequences in response to brain injuries. With a focus on developmental hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and traumatic brain injury, this review offers guidelines for researchers when considering the most appropriate rodent age for the developmental stage or process of interest to approximate human brain development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain InjuriesHumansHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainNeurogenesisOligodendrogliaRodentia5-HT5-hydroxytryptamineAgamma-Aminobutyric acidBrain developmentCentral nervous systemCNSGABGCLGdgestation daygranule cell layerHIHIEHumanHypoxia-ischemiahypoxia-ischemia/hypoxic-ischemichypoxic-ischemic encephalopathyILImmatureinterleukinmagnetic resonance imagingMRINMDAN-methyl-D-aspartateOLoligodendrocytepndpostnatal daypre-OLpre-oligodendrocyteRodentSGZsubgranular zonesubventricular zoneSVZTBItraumatic brain injuryTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID23583307
PMCPMC3737272
OpenAlexW2027917639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.