Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23100282›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2013

Impact of common genetic variation on response to simvastatin therapy among 18 705 participants in the Heart Protection Study.

Jemma C Hopewell, Sarah Parish, Alison Offer, Emma Link, Robert Clarke, Mark Lathrop, Jane Armitage, Rory Collins, MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Polygenic Prediction of Nongoal Response to Statin Therapy.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Predictive Value ofGenes · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jemma C HopewellClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. jemma.hopewell@ctsu.ox.ac.uk
Sarah Parish
Alison Offer
Emma Link
Robert Clarke
Mark Lathrop
Jane Armitage
Rory Collins
MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/08/004Medical Research Council MC_EX_G0801669Medical Research Council MC_U137686853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsStatins reduce LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and the risk of vascular events, but it remains uncertain whether there is clinically relevant genetic variation in their efficacy. This study of 18 705 individuals aims to identify genetic variants related to the lipid response to simvastatin and assess their impact on vascular risk response. METHODS AND

resultsA genome-wide study of the LDL-C and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) response to 40 mg simvastatin daily was performed in 3895 participants in the Heart Protection Study, and the nine strongest associations were tested in 14 810 additional participants. Selected candidate genes were also tested in up to 18 705 individuals. There was 90% power to detect differences of 2.5% in LDL-C response (e.g. 42.5 vs. 40% reduction) in the genome-wide study and of 1% in the candidate gene study. None of the associations from the genome-wide study was replicated, and nor were significant associations found for 26 of 36 candidates tested. Novel lipid response associations with variants in LPA, CELSR2/PSRC1/SORT1, and ABCC2 were found, as well as confirmatory evidence for published associations in LPA, APOE, and SLCO1B1. The largest and most significant effects were with LPA and APOE, but were only 2-3% per allele. Reductions in the risk of major vascular events during 5 years of statin therapy among 18 705 high-risk patients did not differ significantly across genotypes associated with the lipid response.

conclusionsCommon genetic variants do not appear to alter the lipid response to statin therapy by more than a few per cent, and there were similar large reductions in vascular risk with simvastatin irrespective of genotypes associated with the lipid response to simvastatin. Consequently, their value for informing clinical decisions related to maximizing statin efficacy appears to be limited.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticholesteremic AgentsApolipoproteins BCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLFemaleGenetic LociGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansHypercholesterolemiaLipoprotein(a)MaleMiddle AgedABCC2 protein, humanAnticholesteremic AgentsApolipoproteins BCholesterol, LDLLipoprotein(a)Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2Simvastatin

Identifiers

PMID23100282
PMCPMC3612775
OpenAlexW2114951165

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.