Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22963618›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2012

Olive phenolic compounds: metabolic and transcriptional profiling during fruit development.

Fiammetta Alagna, Roberto Mariotti, Francesco Panara, Silvia Caporali, Stefania Urbani, Gianluca Veneziani, Sonia Esposto, Agnese Taticchi, Adolfo Rosati, Rosa Rao and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Genotypic Effect on Olive (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Fermented olives (Food chemistry: X · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiammetta AlagnaCNR-Institute of Plant Genetics, Perugia, Italy. fiammetta.alagna@igv.cnr.it
Roberto Mariotti
Francesco Panara
Silvia Caporali
Stefania Urbani
Gianluca Veneziani
Sonia Esposto
Agnese Taticchi
Adolfo Rosati
Rosa Rao
Gaetano Perrotta
Maurizio Servili
Luciana Baldoni
University of Perugia · ITInstitute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLNational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · ITResearch Centre for Olive Growing and Olive Oil Industry · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlive (Olea europaea L.) fruits contain numerous secondary metabolites, primarily phenolics, terpenes and sterols, some of which are particularly interesting for their nutraceutical properties. This study will attempt to provide further insight into the profile of olive phenolic compounds during fruit development and to identify the major genetic determinants of phenolic metabolism.

resultsThe concentration of the major phenolic compounds, such as oleuropein, demethyloleuropein, 3-4 DHPEA-EDA, ligstroside, tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol, verbascoside and lignans, were measured in the developing fruits of 12 olive cultivars. The content of these compounds varied significantly among the cultivars and decreased during fruit development and maturation, with some compounds showing specificity for certain cultivars. Thirty-five olive transcripts homologous to genes involved in the pathways of the main secondary metabolites were identified from the massive sequencing data of the olive fruit transcriptome or from cDNA-AFLP analysis. Their mRNA levels were determined using RT-qPCR analysis on fruits of high- and low-phenolic varieties (Coratina and Dolce d'Andria, respectively) during three different fruit developmental stages. A strong correlation was observed between phenolic compound concentrations and transcripts putatively involved in their biosynthesis, suggesting a transcriptional regulation of the corresponding pathways. OeDXS, OeGES, OeGE10H and OeADH, encoding putative 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-P synthase, geraniol synthase, geraniol 10-hydroxylase and arogenate dehydrogenase, respectively, were almost exclusively present at 45 days after flowering (DAF), suggesting that these compounds might play a key role in regulating secoiridoid accumulation during fruit development.

conclusionsMetabolic and transcriptional profiling led to the identification of some major players putatively involved in biosynthesis of secondary compounds in the olive tree. Our data represent the first step towards the functional characterisation of important genes for the determination of olive fruit quality.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAmplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisBiosynthetic PathwaysCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemFruitGene Expression ProfilingGenes, PlantGlucosidesIridoid GlucosidesIridoidsMetabolomicsOleaPhenolsPhenylethyl AlcoholPlant OilsPlant Proteins4-hydroxyphenylethanolcyclohexadienyl dehydrogenaseCytochrome P-450 Enzyme Systemdemethyloleuropeingeraniol 10-hydroxylaseGlucosidesIridoid GlucosidesIridoidsligstrosideoleuropeinPhenolsPhenylethyl AlcoholPlant OilsPlant ProteinsPrephenate DehydrogenasePyransRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22963618
PMCPMC3480905
OpenAlexW1999834925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.