Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22368281›Full record

ArticleJournal of lipid research2012

Genome-wide association study of genetic determinants of LDL-c response to atorvastatin therapy: importance of Lp(a).

Harshal A Deshmukh, Helen M Colhoun, Toby Johnson, Paul M McKeigue, D John Betteridge, Paul N Durrington, John H Fuller, Shona Livingstone, Valentine Charlton-Menys, Andrew Neil and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of lipid research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Polygenic Prediction of Nongoal Response to Statin Therapy.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Association ofPeerJ · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Harshal A DeshmukhUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Helen M ColhounUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. Electronic address: h.colhoun@cpse.dundee.ac.uk.
Toby JohnsonBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul M McKeigueUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
D John BetteridgeUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul N DurringtonUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
John H FullerUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Shona LivingstoneUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Valentine Charlton-MenysUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Andrew NeilUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Neil PoulterInternational Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Peter SeverInternational Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Denis C ShieldsComplex and Adaptive Systems Laboratory, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Alice V StantonRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Aurobindo ChatterjeePfizer Ltd., New York, NY.
Craig HydePfizer Ltd., New York, NY.
Roberto A CallePfizer Ltd., New York, NY.
David A DeMiccoPfizer Ltd., New York, NY.
Stella TrompetDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands and.
Iris PostmusDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ian FordRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; and.
J Wouter JukemaDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands and; Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mark CaulfieldBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Graham A HitmanBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Pfizer (United States) · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G9521010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We carried out a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of LDL-c response to statin using data from participants in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS; n = 1,156), the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT; n = 895), and the observational phase of ASCOT (n = 651), all of whom were prescribed atorvastatin 10 mg. Following genome-wide imputation, we combined data from the three studies in a meta-analysis. We found associations of LDL-c response to atorvastatin that reached genome-wide significance at rs10455872 (P = 6.13 × 10(-9)) within the LPA gene and at two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) within the APOE region (rs445925; P = 2.22 × 10(-16) and rs4420638; P = 1.01 × 10(-11)) that are proxies for the ε2 and ε4 variants, respectively, in APOE. The novel association with the LPA SNP was replicated in the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) trial (P = 0.009). Using CARDS data, we further showed that atorvastatin therapy did not alter lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and that Lp(a) levels accounted for all of the associations of SNPs in the LPA gene and the apparent LDL-c response levels. However, statin therapy had a similar effect in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients in the top quartile for serum Lp(a) levels (HR = 0.60) compared with those in the lower three quartiles (HR = 0.66; P = 0.8 for interaction). The data emphasize that high Lp(a) levels affect the measurement of LDL-c and the clinical estimation of LDL-c response. Therefore, an apparently lower LDL-c response to statin therapy may indicate a need for measurement of Lp(a). However, statin therapy seems beneficial even in those with high Lp(a).

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAdultAgedAtorvastatinCholesterol, LDLDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGenotypeGlucosyltransferasesHeptanoic AcidsHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPlacebo EffectPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAtorvastatinCholesterol, LDLGlucosyltransferasesHeptanoic AcidsPyrrolesReceptors, Lysophosphatidic Acid

Identifiers

PMID22368281
PMCPMC3329377
OpenAlexW2048938272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.