Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22365357›Full record

ArticleFood microbiology2012

Rapid discrimination of Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Santiago Ruiz-Moyano, Nannan Tao, Mark A Underwood, David A Mills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Differentiating betweenFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Identification and Classification for theFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  7. A comparative study of bifidobacteria in human babies and adults.Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Santiago Ruiz-MoyanoDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Nannan Tao
Mark A Underwood
David A Mills
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Prevention and PredictionR01HD059127 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEBRILLA, CARLITO B, MILLS, DAVID ANDREW · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
Structures, Functions, & Genetic Diversity of Oligosaccharides in MilkR01HD061923 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEBRILLA, CARLITO B · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Activation of Host-Probiotic Communication by Prebiotic Milk OligosaccharidesR21AT006180 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MILLS, DAVID ANDREW, RAYBOULD, HELEN E · 2011 to 2012
$421k
NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT006180NCCIH NIH HHS R21AT006180NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059127NICHD NIH HHS R01HD059127NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061923NICHD NIH HHS R01HD061923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the species Bifidobacterium animalis consists of two subspecies, B. animalis subsp. lactis and B. animalis subsp. animalis. Among these two subspecies, B. animalis subsp. lactis is especially important because it is widely used in the manufacture of probiotic dairy products. The application of these microbes in the food industry demands fast, accurate and low cost methods to differentiate between species and strains. Although various genotypic methods have been employed to discriminate between these two subspecies, they are not easily adapted for rapid identification in the industry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) to differentiate between the two subspecies of B. animalis, and for discrimination at strain level. We identified twenty-three strains of B. animalis at subspecies and strain level by genotypic methods and by proteomics using MALDI-TOF MS. The proteomics identification by MALDI-TOF was nearly identical to that obtained by genotypic identification using comparison of tuf and atpD gene sequences, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions, and deletions (INDELs). We identified four protein markers, L1, L2, A1, and A2, which are useful for discriminating between both subspecies. Proteomics identification using MALDI-TOF MS was therefore an accurate method for discriminating and identifying these bacteria. Given the speed in which this method is achieved (~20 min including sample preparation), MALDI-TOF MS is promising as a tool for rapid discrimination of starter cultures and probiotics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBifidobacteriumGene DeletionHumansMutagenesis, InsertionalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProteomicsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

PMID22365357
PMCPMC3297970
OpenAlexW1978281245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.