ReviewAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2011
A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development.
Review in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Effect of a curriculum transformation on pharmacy student self-efficacy, self-reported activities, and satisfaction in degree and career choice.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Requirements for improving social capital among faculty members of medical universities: A multicenter qualitative study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Long-term evaluation of a train-the-trainer workshop for pharmacy faculty using the RE-AIM framework.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021Article
- Ten Tips for Pharmacy Faculty Members for Successfully Navigating Promotion and Tenure.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021Article
- Facilitating Advancement of Clinical-Track Pharmacy Faculty Members.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2020Article
- Self-Help for the Pharmacy Educator.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2018Review
- Methods Used by Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy to Prepare Student Pharmacists for Careers in Academia.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017Article
- Pharmacy Educator Motives to Pursue Pedagogical Knowledge.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Article
- Faculty development program models to advance teaching and learning within health science programs.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2014Article
- Perceptions of tenure and tenure reform in academic pharmacy.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2014Article
- A blueprint for transitioning pharmacy residents into successful clinical faculty members in colleges and schools of pharmacy.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2013Review
- Faculty career transitions: guidance for what's next.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2013Article
- A graduate student mentoring program to develop interest in research.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 2009-2010 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Council of Faculties Faculty Affairs Committee reviewed published literature assessing the scope and outcomes of faculty development for tenure and promotion. Relevant articles were identified via a PubMed search, review of pharmacy education journals, and identification of position papers from major healthcare professions academic organizations. While programs intended to enhance faculty development were described by some healthcare professions, relatively little specific to pharmacy has been published and none of the healthcare professions have adequately evaluated the impact of various faculty-development programs on associated outcomes.The paucity of published information strongly suggests a lack of outcomes-oriented faculty-development programs in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Substantial steps are required toward the development and scholarly evaluation of faculty-development programs. As these programs are developed and assessed, evaluations must encompass all faculty subgroups, including tenure- and nontenure track faculty members, volunteer faculty members, women, and underrepresented minorities. This paper proposes AACP, college and school, and department-level recommendations intended to ensure faculty success in achieving tenure and promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.