ArticleCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2011
Microbiological identification and analysis of swine tonsils collected from carcasses at slaughter.
Article in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Home is where the host is: evolutionary history of geographic spread, host switching and adaptive genomic signatures in two generalist group BMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Biofilm formation in Streptococcus suis: in vitro impact of serovars and assessment of coinfections with other porcine respiratory disease complex bacterial pathogens.Veterinary research · 2024Article
- Temporal and Serotypic Dynamics ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Emergence of Group B Streptococcus Disease in Pigs and Porcupines, Italy.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Multiple Drug ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Microbiota Profiling on Veterinary Faculty Restroom Surfaces and Source Tracking.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Assessment on the efficacy of methods 2 to 5 and method 7 set out in Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 to inactivate relevant pathogens when producing processed animal protein of porcine origin intended to feed poultry and aquaculture animals.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Associations between Pleurisy and the Main Bacterial Pathogens of the Porcine Respiratory Diseases Complex (PRDC).Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Response of lymphocytes from pigs naturally infected with porcine respiratory disease complex at 3 different stages of development.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2023Article
- Prevalence and Persistence of Multidrug-ResistantFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Experimental evaluation of protection and immunogenicity of Streptococcus suis bacterin-based vaccines formulated with different commercial adjuvants in weaned piglets.Veterinary research · 2021Article
- Co-infection analysis of bacterial and viral respiratory pathogens from clinically healthy swine in Eastern China.Veterinary medicine and science · 2021Article
- Review of the speculative role of co-infections in Streptococcus suis-associated diseases in pigs.Veterinary research · 2021Review
- Detection of VariousAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Isolation and characteristics of multi-drug resistant Streptococcus porcinus from the vaginal secretions of sow with endometritis.BMC veterinary research · 2020Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2018Review
- Survey of porcine respiratory disease complex-associated pathogens among commercial pig farms in Korea via oral fluid method.Journal of veterinary science · 2017Article
- Novel IgG-Degrading Enzymes of the IgdE Protease Family Link Substrate Specificity to Host Tropism of Streptococcus Species.PloS one · 2016Article
- Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica in/on tonsils and mandibular lymph nodes of slaughtered pigs.Folia microbiologica · 2015Article
- A fishy tale: a man with empyema caused by Streptococcus halichoeri.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this 7-month study was to determine the prevalence of porcine pathogens of the tonsil of the soft palate of swine at slaughter. Additional objectives were to determine if sampling the carcasses of normal or abnormal hogs provided different microbiological profiles and if the slaughter plant provides a feasible sampling frame and environment for detecting and monitoring important pathogens in tonsils that have health implications for both swine and humans. A total of 395 samples were collected from 264 farms. Of these, 180 tonsils were collected from normal carcasses and 215 tonsils were collected from carcasses that were diverted to the hold rail. Laboratory testing included bacteriological culture and identification as well as real time-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PPRSV) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for porcine circovirus-2 (PCV-2). The most commonly isolated bacteria included: Streptococcus suis (53.7%), Arcanobacterium pyogenes (29.9%), Pasteurella multocida (27.3%), and Streptococcus porcinus (19.5%). Virus screening revealed evidence of PRRSV and PCV-2 in 22.0% and 11.9% of the samples, respectively. Salmonella Typhimurium and Yersinia enterocolitica were isolated in 0.5% and 1.8% of the samples, respectively. Tonsils collected from the hold rail were more likely to be positive for Staphylococcus hyicus [odds ratio (OR) = 7.51, confidence interval (CI) = 2.89 to 19.54], Streptococcus porcinus (OR = 9.93, CI = 4.27 to 23.10), and Streptococcus suis (OR = 2.16, CI = 1.45 to 3.24). Tonsils collected from abnormal carcasses were less likely to be positive for Staphylococcus aureus (OR = 0.05, CI = 0.005 to 0.482).
Indexed as
Identifiers
21731180PMC3062919W1824080870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.