ReviewDrugs2011
Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.
Review in Drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Lower exposure and faster clearance of bevacizumab in gastric cancer and the impact of patient variables: analysis of individual data from AVAGAST phase III trial.The AAPS journal · 2014Trial
- Synthesis and profiling of a 3-aminopyridin-2-one-based kinase targeted fragment library: Identification of 3-amino-5-(pyridin-4-yl)pyridin-2(1H)-one scaffold for monopolar spindle 1 (MPS1) and Aurora kinases inhibition.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2018Article
- A network meta-analysis of short-term efficacy of different single-drug targeted therapies in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.Bioscience reports · 2017Article
- SEOM/SERAM consensus statement on radiological diagnosis, response assessment and follow-up in colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017Article
- Immune effects of bevacizumab: killing two birds with one stone.Cancer microenvironment : official journal of the International Cancer Microenvironment Society · 2015Article
- Review
- Axitinib: a review of its safety and efficacy in the treatment of adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2013Review
- Prognostic utility of pre-operative circulating osteopontin, carbonic anhydrase IX and CRP in renal cell carcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2012Article
- Predicting responses to sunitinib using single nucleotide polymorphisms: Progress and recommendations for future trials.Genome medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agents have rapidly been adopted into standard-of-care treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, a substantial proportion of patients fail to respond to these agents or experience considerable toxicity. This article reviews the benefits and limitations of currently approved anti-VEGF agents in advanced and metastatic RCC, and the role for newly approved and developmental agents. Sunitinib and bevacizumab plus interferon (IFN)-α have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) compared with IFNα in treatment-naïve patients. A PFS benefit has also been shown with sorafenib versus placebo second-line to cytokine therapy. However, no anti-VEGF agent has shown a significant overall survival benefit. Anti-VEGF therapy is generally well tolerated, but a number of key adverse events, including dermatological, mucosal and constitutional symptoms, may limit treatment compliance and success. Pazopanib is a recently approved, highly selective anti-VEGF agent that shows benefit in PFS over IFNα, with low rates of treatment-related adverse events and, therefore, may be better tolerated than other currently approved agents. The advent of VEGF-targeted therapy for RCC has greatly improved prospects for patients with advanced or metastatic disease, but more efficacious agents are required that demonstrate a clear survival advantage. Ongoing trials evaluating novel anti-VEGF therapies could establish whether the increased potency and selectivity of these agents results in improved efficacy and tolerability in RCC patients, further improving their prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21711062What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.