Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21704190›Full record

ReviewComparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP2012

The rainbow trout liver cancer model: response to environmental chemicals and studies on promotion and chemoprevention.

David E Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Risk assessment of aflatoxins in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Retrospective and Prospective Look at Aflatoxin Research and Development from a Practical Standpoint.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Cytotoxic Effects of Chlorophyllides in Ethanol Crude Extracts from Plant Leaves.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David E WilliamsDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, The Superfund Center and The Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University, Weniger 435, Corvallis, OR 97331-6503, USA. david.williams@oregonstate.edu
Oregon State University · US

Funding

Ultra-Low Dose Carcinogen Testing with the Trout ModelR01ES013534 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, DAVID E · 2005 to 2009
$2.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES013534NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES013534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are an outstanding model of liver cancer induction by environmental chemicals and development of strategies for chemoprevention. Trout have critical and unique advantages allowing for cancer studies with 40,000 animals to determine dose-response at levels orders of magnitude lower than possible in rodents. Examples of two promoters in this model, the dietary supplement dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and industrial chemical perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), are presented. In addition, indole-3-carbinol (I3C) and chlorophyllin (CHL) inhibit initiation following exposure to potent human chemical carcinogens (e.g., aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1))). Two "ED(001)" cancer studies have been conducted, utilizing approximately 40,000 trout, by dietary exposure to AFB(1) and dibenzo[d,e,f,p]chrysene (DBC). These studies represent the two largest cancer studies ever performed and expand the dose-response dataset generated by the 25,000 mouse "ED(01)" study over an order of magnitude. With DBC, the liver tumor response fell well below the LED(10) line, often used for risk assessment, even though the biomarker (liver DBC-DNA adducts) remained linear. Conversely, the response with AFB(1) remained relatively linear throughout the entire dose range. These contributions to elucidation of mechanisms of liver cancer, induced by environmental chemicals and the remarkable datasets generated with ED(001) studies, make important contributions to carcinogenesis and chemoprevention.

Indexed as

ChemopreventionAflatoxin B1AnimalsBenzopyrenesCaprylatesChlorophyllidesDehydroepiandrosteroneDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnvironmental ExposureFluorocarbonsIndolesLiverLiver Neoplasms, ExperimentalOncorhynchus mykissPromoter Regions, GeneticRisk AssessmentAflatoxin B1BenzopyrenesCaprylatesChlorophyllideschlorophyllinDehydroepiandrosteronedibenzo(a,l)pyreneFluorocarbonsindole-3-carbinolIndolesperfluorooctanoic acid

Identifiers

PMID21704190
PMCPMC3219792
OpenAlexW2031400039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.