Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21666023›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Comparative phenotypic and molecular genetic profiling of wild Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strains of the L. lactis subsp. lactis and L. lactis subsp. cremoris genotypes, isolated from starter-free cheeses made of raw milk.

Elena Fernández, Angel Alegría, Susana Delgado, M Cruz Martín, Baltasar Mayo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inactivation of KhpB (EloR/Jag) inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. The Invisible Threat of Antibiotic Resistance in Food.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Evaluation of autochthonousFood science and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Presence of Plasmids inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Suitability of the Nisin Z-producerAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. TheFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. DetectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elena FernándezDepartamento de Microbiología y Bioquímica, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (CSIC), Carretera de Infiesto s/n, 33300-Villaviciosa, Spain.
Angel Alegría
Susana Delgado
M Cruz Martín
Baltasar Mayo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty Lactococcus lactis strains with an L. lactis subsp. lactis phenotype isolated from five traditional cheeses made of raw milk with no added starters belonging to the L. lactis subsp. lactis and L. lactis subsp. cremoris genotypes (lactis and cremoris genotypes, respectively; 10 strains each) were subjected to a series of phenotypic and genetic typing methods, with the aims of determining their phylogenetic relationships and suitability as starters. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of intact genomes digested with SalI and SmaI proved that all strains were different except for three isolates of the cremoris genotype, which showed identical PFGE profiles. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis using internal sequences of seven loci (namely, atpA, rpoA, pheS, pepN, bcaT, pepX, and 16S rRNA gene) revealed considerable intergenotype nucleotide polymorphism, although deduced amino acid changes were scarce. Analysis of the MLST data for the present strains and others from other dairy and nondairy sources showed that all of them clustered into the cremoris or lactis genotype group, by using both independent and combined gene sequences. These two groups of strains also showed distinctive carbohydrate fermentation and enzyme activity profiles, with the strains in the cremoris group showing broader profiles. However, the profiles of resistance/susceptibility to 16 antibiotics were very similar, showing no atypical resistance, except for tetracycline resistance in three identical cremoris genotype isolates. The numbers and concentrations of volatile compounds produced in milk by the strains belonging to these two groups were clearly different, with the cremoris genotype strains producing higher concentrations of more branched-chain, derived compounds. Together, the present results support the idea that the lactis and cremoris genotypes of phenotypic Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis actually represent true subspecies. Some strains of the two subspecies in this study appear to be good starter candidates.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesBase SequenceCheeseDrug Resistance, BacterialFood MicrobiologyGenotypeLactococcus lactisMilkMolecular Sequence DataMultilocus Sequence TypingPhenotypePhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID21666023
PMCPMC3147482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.