Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21660536›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2011

Transfer of take-home messages in graduate ICU education.

Alexandre Lautrette, Carole Schwebel, Didier Gruson, R W Talbot, Jean-François Timsit, Bertrand Souweine

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre LautretteMedical ICU, Pôle REUNNIRH, CHU Gabriel Montpied Teaching Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Université d'Auvergne-Clermont Ferrand 1, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France. alautrette@chu-clermontferrand.fr
Carole Schwebel
Didier Gruson
R W Talbot
Jean-François Timsit
Bertrand Souweine
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRInserm · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTeaching by lecture (lecture format) is widely used at congresses and in medical educational programmes. The process involves the transfer of take-home messages. The aim of this study was to assess the number of take-home messages identified by postgraduate critical care junior doctors (juniors) during lectures.

methodsThis was a prospective observational study of 13 lectures. Lecturers were not informed in advance of the study. At the end of the lecture (30 or 50 min), the lecturer (senior doctor) and juniors listed the three main take-home messages on a form. Subjective elements of the juniors' appraisal (quality of the presentation, explanation of the topic's relevance, enthusiasm of the lecturer, background, case-based, delivery and personality, comprehensibility, practical applicability of information given, prioritization, presence of raw data, references, overall satisfaction) and objective elements (length of lecture, number of take-home messages written on the slides) of the lectures were recorded. Successful knowledge transfer was assessed by matching lecturers' and juniors' take-home messages.

resultsIn total, 367 forms completed by 367 juniors were analysed. A match equal to 3 (highest match), 2, 1 or 0 was observed in 3.8, 26.7, 48.2 and 21.2% of the forms, respectively. No single subjective or objective element of the lecture was associated with the number of identified take-home messages.

conclusionsTwo-thirds of critical care junior doctors identified at best only one of the three main take-home messages of a lecture, suggesting that knowledge transfer is poor during passive format learning. These results suggest that there is a need to develop strategies to improve the performance of lecture-based learning.

Indexed as

LearningCritical CareEducation, Medical, GraduateFranceHumansIntensive Care UnitsProspective StudiesTeaching

Identifiers

PMID21660536
OpenAlexW2045563103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.