Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21376068›Full record

ReviewPhysiology & behavior2011

The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding.

Yada Treesukosol, Kimberly R Smith, Alan C Spector

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology & behavior, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Gustatory and olfactory-guided responsiveness to maltodextrin solutions in mice.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Inhibitory Gating of Thalamocortical Inputs onto Rat Gustatory Insular Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A Novel Mechanism for T1R-Independent Taste Responses to Concentrated Sugars.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ConsumingNutrients · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yada TreesukosolDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, 1107 West Call Street, P.O. Box 3064301, Tallahassee FL 32306, USA.
Kimberly R Smith
Alan C Spector
Florida State University · US

Funding

PSYCHOPHYSICAL EVALUATION OF TASTE FUNCTIONR01DC004574 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SPECTOR, ALAN C · 2001 to 2019
$4.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004574NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC004574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of the T1R family of Class C G protein-coupled receptors in the peripheral gustatory system a decade ago has been a tremendous advance for taste research, and its conceptual reach has extended to other organ systems. There are three proteins in the family, T1R1, T1R2, and T1R3, encoded by their respective genes, Tas1r1, Tas1r2, and Tas1r3. T1R2 combines with T1R3 to form a heterodimer that binds with sugars and other sweeteners. T1R3 also combines with T1R1 to form a heterodimer that binds with l-amino acids. These proteins are expressed not only in taste bud cells, but one or more of these T1Rs have also been identified in the nasal epithelium, gut, pancreas, liver, kidney, testes and brain in various mammalian species. Here we review current perspectives regarding the functional role of these receptors, concentrating on sweet taste and feeding. We also discuss behavioral findings suggesting that a glucose polymer mixture, Polycose, which rodents avidly prefer, appears to activate a receptor that does not depend on the combined expression of T1R2 and T1R3. In addition, although the T1Rs have been implicated as playing a role in glucose sensing, T1R2 knock-out (KO) and T1R3 KO mice display normal chow and fluid intake as well as normal body weight compared with same-sex littermate wild type (WT) controls. Moreover, regardless of whether they are fasted or not, these KO mice do not differ from their WT counterparts in their Polycose intake across a broad range of concentrations in 30-minute intake tests. The functional implications of these results and those in the literature are considered.

Indexed as

AnimalsEatingMiceReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSweetening AgentsTasteReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSweetening Agentstaste receptors, type 1

Identifiers

PMID21376068
PMCPMC3186843
OpenAlexW2089303539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.