Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20966876›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2010

Plant phenolics: extraction, analysis and their antioxidant and anticancer properties.

Jin Dai, Russell J Mumper

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 966 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
966citing papers in PubMed
35.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

966 citing papers in PubMed, 4,167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antioxidant Potential ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Optimization and Metabolomic Profiling ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A comprehensive review ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

906 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jin DaiFour Tigers LLC, 1501 Bull Lea Road, Suite 105, Lexington, Kentucky 40511, USA.
Russell J Mumper
University of Kentucky · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenolics are broadly distributed in the plant kingdom and are the most abundant secondary metabolites of plants. Plant polyphenols have drawn increasing attention due to their potent antioxidant properties and their marked effects in the prevention of various oxidative stress associated diseases such as cancer. In the last few years, the identification and development of phenolic compounds or extracts from different plants has become a major area of health- and medical-related research. This review provides an updated and comprehensive overview on phenolic extraction, purification, analysis and quantification as well as their antioxidant properties. Furthermore, the anticancer effects of phenolics in-vitro and in-vivo animal models are viewed, including recent human intervention studies. Finally, possible mechanisms of action involving antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity as well as interference with cellular functions are discussed.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsPhenolsAnimalsHumansMolecular StructureNeoplasmsOxidation-ReductionOxidative StressPlant ExtractsAntineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsPhenolsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID20966876
PMCPMC6259146
OpenAlexW1965606785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.