Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19613461›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2009

The insect chemoreceptor superfamily in Drosophila pseudoobscura: molecular evolution of ecologically-relevant genes over 25 million years.

Hugh M Robertson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PeerJ · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sexual isolation of male moths explained by a single pheromone response QTL containing four receptor genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Evolution of the sugar receptors in insects.BMC evolutionary biology · 2009
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hugh M RobertsonDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. hughrobe@uiuc.edu

Funding

Gustatory and olfactory receptors of Anopheles gambiaeR01AI056081 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ROBERTSON, HUGH M. · 2003 to 2006
$1.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI056081NIAID NIH HHS R01AI056081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The insect chemoreceptor superfamily, consisting of the odorant receptor (Or) and gustatory receptor (Gr) families, exhibits patterns of evolution ranging from highly conserved proteins to lineage-specific gene subfamily expansions when compared across insect suborders and orders. Here their evolution across the timespan of 25 million years is examined which yield orthologous divergences ranging from 5-50%. They also reveal the beginnings of lineage-specific gene subfamilies as multiple duplications of particular gene lineages in either or both Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura (Frolova and Astaurov) (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Gene losses and pseudogenes are similarly evident in both lineages, and even in closer comparisons of D. melanogaster with D. yakuba, leaving these species with roughly similar numbers of chemoreceptors despite considerable gene turnover. The large range of divergences and gene duplications provide abundant raw material for studies of structure and function in this novel superfamily, which contains proteins that evolved to bind specific ligands that mediate much of the ecology and mating behavior of insects.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGenes, InsectReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, OdorantDrosophila Proteinsgustatory receptor, DrosophilaReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID19613461
PMCPMC3011837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.