Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19572116›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2009

The influence of glucose-lowering therapies on cancer risk in type 2 diabetes.

C J Currie, C D Poole, E A M Gale

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 501 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
501citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
53.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

501 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The association between diabetes and gastric cancer: results from the Stomach Cancer Pooling Project Consortium.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

441 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C J CurrieSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, The Pharma Research Centre, Cardiff MediCentre, Cardiff, CF14 4UJ, UK. currie@cardiff.ac.uk
C D Poole
E A M Gale
Cardiff University · GBMidatech Pharma (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe risk of developing a range of solid tumours is increased in type 2 diabetes, and may be influenced by glucose-lowering therapies. We examined the risk of development of solid tumours in relation to treatment with oral agents, human insulin and insulin analogues.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of people treated in UK general practices. Those included in the analysis developed diabetes >40 years of age, and started treatment with oral agents or insulin after 2000. A total of 62,809 patients were divided into four groups according to whether they received monotherapy with metformin or sulfonylurea, combined therapy (metformin plus sulfonylurea), or insulin. Insulin users were grouped according to treatment with insulin glargine, long-acting human insulin, biphasic analogue and human biphasic insulin. The outcome measures were progression to any solid tumour, or cancer of the breast, colon, pancreas or prostate. Confounding factors were accounted for using Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsMetformin monotherapy carried the lowest risk of cancer. In comparison, the adjusted HR was 1.08 (95% CI 0.96-1.21) for metformin plus sulfonylurea, 1.36 (95% CI 1.19-1.54) for sulfonylurea monotherapy, and 1.42 (95% CI 1.27-1.60) for insulin-based regimens. Adding metformin to insulin reduced progression to cancer (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.66). The risk for those on basal human insulin alone vs insulin glargine alone was 1.24 (95% CI 0.90-1.70). Compared with metformin, insulin therapy increased the risk of colorectal (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.23-2.33) or pancreatic cancer (HR 4.63, 95% CI 2.64-8.10), but did not influence the risk of breast or prostate cancer. Sulfonylureas were associated with a similar pattern of risk as insulin. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThose on insulin or insulin secretagogues were more likely to develop solid cancers than those on metformin, and combination with metformin abolished most of this excess risk. Metformin use was associated with lower risk of cancer of the colon or pancreas, but did not affect the risk of breast or prostate cancer. Use of insulin analogues was not associated with increased cancer risk as compared with human insulin.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood PressureCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease ProgressionFamily PracticeFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMetforminGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetformin

Identifiers

PMID19572116
OpenAlexW2169214947

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.