Trial reportCirculation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society2009

Incremental effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on cardiovascular events in statin-treated patients with coronary artery disease.

Masunori Matsuzaki, Mitsuhiro Yokoyama, Yasushi Saito, Hideki Origasa, Yuichi Ishikawa, Shinichi Oikawa, Jun Sasaki, Hitoshi Hishida, Hiroshige Itakura, Toru Kita and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society, 2009. The graph read 4 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it supports the treatment in 2. Cited by 50 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

4numbers the graph read from it
2cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0.51 · no effect
Major coronary events (MCE)1,800 mg of EPA + statin vs statin alone, in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI)favours the treatment · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.730.54 to 0.98P=0.033
Among 1,050 patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI), the incidence of MCE in the EPA group (15.0%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (20.1%, adjusted hazard ratio =0.73, 95%CI 0.54-0.98, P=0.033, NNT =19).

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Major coronary events (MCE)1,800 mg of EPA + statin vs statin alonecomparator not stated · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
number needed to treat 49.0
The incidence of MCE was significantly lower in the EPA group (8.7% vs 10.7%, adjusted hazard ratio =0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.96, P=0.017, number needed to treat (NNT) =49).
Major coronary events (MCE)1,800 mg of EPA + statin vs statin alone, in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI)no interval or p-value · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
number needed to treat 19.0
Among 1,050 patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI), the incidence of MCE in the EPA group (15.0%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (20.1%, adjusted hazard ratio =0.73, 95%CI 0.54-0.98, P=0.033, NNT =19).
Major coronary events (MCE)1,800 mg of EPA + statin vs statin alonecomparator not stated · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.770.63 to 0.96P=0.017
The incidence of MCE was significantly lower in the EPA group (8.7% vs 10.7%, adjusted hazard ratio =0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.96, P=0.017, number needed to treat (NNT) =49).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Other lipid agents×cardiovascular events

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

10 readable studies in this cell: 5 favour the treatment, 5 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.80established · 4 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.50This paper moves it by +0.30. It would be contested.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
This paper · 2009
HR 0.730.54 to 0.98
NCT0020287818,144 enrolled · 2005
HR 0.940.89 to 0.99
NCT0061899526 enrolled · 2007
Geometric least-squares mean ratio 0.940.77 to 1.14

Statins×cardiovascular events

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

29 readable studies in this cell: 17 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.86replicated · 12 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.85This paper moves it by +0.01.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
This paper · 2009
HR 0.730.54 to 0.98
HR 0.750.64 to 0.88
NCT023442907,769 enrolled · 2015
HR 0.640.48 to 0.84
NCT03944512102 enrolled · 2019
RR 0.670.37 to 1.19
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Marine-derived n-3 fatty acids therapy for stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Marine-derived n-3 fatty acids therapy for stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Arterial Hypertension: Is There Any Good News?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Deranged Myocardial Fatty Acid Metabolism in Heart Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. High-Dose Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Cardiovascular Prevention: Finally Living Up to Their Potential?American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Masunori MatsuzakiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Minamikogushi, Ube, Japan. masunori@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp
Mitsuhiro Yokoyama
Yasushi Saito
Hideki Origasa
Yuichi Ishikawa
Shinichi Oikawa
Jun Sasaki
Hitoshi Hishida
Hiroshige Itakura
Toru Kita
Akira Kitabatake
Noriaki Nakaya
Toshiie Sakata
Kazuyuki Shimada
Kunio Shirato
Yuji Matsuzawa
JELIS Investigators
Kobe University · JPChiba University · JPFujita Health University · JPIbaraki Christian University · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JPIto Hospital · JPJichi Medical University · JPKyoto University · JPNakamura Gakuen University · JPNippon Medical School · JPSumitomo Hospital · JPTaoka Hospital · JPUniversity of Toyama · JPYamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

backgroundResults from JELIS (Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study) demonstrated the efficacy of pure eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in preventing coronary artery disease (CAD) in hypercholesterolemic patients under statin treatment. The present study examined in detail whether EPA is effective for the secondary prevention of CAD. METHODS AND

resultsPatients with established CAD and a total cholesterol level > or =250 mg/dl were observed with a mean follow-up of 4.6 years. They were randomly assigned to receive either 1,800 mg of EPA + statin (EPA group) or statin alone (control group). The incidence of major coronary events (MCE) were compared in the 2 groups. The incidence of MCE was significantly lower in the EPA group (8.7% vs 10.7%, adjusted hazard ratio =0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.96, P=0.017, number needed to treat (NNT) =49). Among 1,050 patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI), the incidence of MCE in the EPA group (15.0%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (20.1%, adjusted hazard ratio =0.73, 95%CI 0.54-0.98, P=0.033, NNT =19).

conclusionsEPA is effective for secondary prevention of CAD, especially in individuals with prior MI, and should be added to conventional treatment.

Indexed as

AgedCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug Therapy, CombinationEicosapentaenoic AcidFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypercholesterolemiaIncidenceJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedCholesterol, LDLEicosapentaenoic AcidHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID19423946
OpenAlexW2031477533

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.