Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17395752›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes2007

Factors associated with diabetes onset during metformin versus placebo therapy in the diabetes prevention program.

John M Lachin, Costas A Christophi, Sharon L Edelstein, David A Ehrmann, Richard F Hamman, Steven E Kahn, William C Knowler, David M Nathan, DDK Research Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. PREVENT-DM Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Lifestyle Intervention and Metformin.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017 · on this map
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

John M LachinD, Diabetes Prevention Program Coordinating Center, The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, 6110 Executive Blvd., Suite 750, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. dppmail@biostat.bsc.gwu.edu
Costas A Christophi
Sharon L Edelstein
David A Ehrmann
Richard F Hamman
Steven E Kahn
William C Knowler
David M Nathan
DDK Research Group
George Washington University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

PRIMARY PREVENTION TRIAL--DATA COORDINATING CENTERU01DK048489 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JABLONSKI, KATHLEEN ANN, TEMPROSA, MARINELLA · 1994 to 2021
$84.8M
Native Americans: Diabetes Mellitus/Chronic DiseasesZ01DK069000 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI KNOWLER, WILLIAM C · 1986 to 2008
$680k
Intramural NIH HHSNIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Diabetes Prevention Program, treatment of subjects with impaired glucose tolerance with metformin >3.2 years reduced the risk of developing type 2 diabetes by 30% compared with placebo. This study describes the mechanisms of this effect. In proportional hazards regression models with 2,155 subjects, changes in weight, the insulinogenic index (IGR), fasting insulin, and proinsulin were predictive of diabetes, though to different degrees within each group. The mean change in weight, fasting insulin, and proinsulin, but not IGR, differed between groups during the study. The 1.7-kg weight loss with metformin versus a 0.3-kg gain with placebo alone explained 64% of the beneficial metformin effect on diabetes risk. Adjustment for weight, fasting insulin, proinsulin, and other metabolic factors combined explained 81% of the beneficial metformin effect, but it remained nominally significant (P = 0.034). After the addition of changes in fasting glucose, 99% of the group effect was explained and is no longer significant. Treatment of high-risk subjects with metformin results in modest weight loss and favorable changes in insulin sensitivity and proinsulin, which contribute to a reduction in the risk of diabetes apart from the associated reductions in fasting glucose.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBody SizeDiabetes MellitusGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLife StyleMetforminMultivariate AnalysisPlacebosProportional Hazards ModelsBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID17395752
PMCPMC2533728
OpenAlexW2167320654

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.