Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16969378›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2007

Influence of three rapeseed oil-rich diets, fortified with alpha-linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid or docosahexaenoic acid on the composition and oxidizability of low-density lipoproteins: results of a controlled study in healthy volunteers.

S Egert, V Somoza, F Kannenberg, M Fobker, K Krome, H F Erbersdobler, U Wahrburg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S EgertDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Applied Sciences, Muenster, Germany. aegert@fh-muenster.de
V Somoza
F Kannenberg
M Fobker
K Krome
H F Erbersdobler
U Wahrburg
Augenstern · DEFH Münster · DEKiel University · DELeibniz Association · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the individual effects of dietary alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) fatty acid composition, ex vivo LDL oxidizability and tocopherol requirement. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A randomized strictly controlled dietary study with three dietary groups and a parallel design, consisting of two consecutive periods. Sixty-one healthy young volunteers, students at a nearby college, were included. Forty-eight subjects (13 males, 35 females) completed the study.

interventionsSubjects received a 2-week wash-in diet rich in monounsaturated fatty acids (21% energy) followed by experimental diets enriched with about 1% of energy of ALA, EPA or DHA for 3 weeks. The omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids were provided with special rapeseed oils and margarines. The wash-in diet and the experimental diets were identical, apart from the n-3 fatty acid composition and the tocopherol content, which was adjusted to the content of dienoic acid equivalents.

resultsEx vivo oxidative susceptibility of LDL was highest after the DHA diet, indicated by a decrease in lag time (-16%, P<0.001) and an increase in the maximum amount of conjugated dienes (+7%, P<0.001). The EPA diet decreased the lag time (-16%, P<0.001) and the propagation rate (-12%, P<0.01). Tocopherol concentrations in LDL decreased in the ALA group (-13.5%, P<0.05) and DHA group (-7.3%, P<0.05). Plasma contents of tocopherol equivalents significantly decreased in all three experimental groups (ALA group: -5.0%, EPA group: -5.7%, DHA group: -12.8%). The content of the three n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid differently increased in the LDL: on the ALA diet, the ALA content increased by 89% (P<0.001), on the EPA diet the EPA content increased by 809% (P<0.001) and on the DHA diet, the DHA content increased by 200% (P<0.001). In addition, the EPA content also enhanced (without dietary intake) in the ALA group (+35%, P<0.01) and in the DHA group (+284%, P<0.001).

conclusionsDietary intake of ALA, EPA or DHA led to a significant enrichment of the respective fatty acid in the LDL particles, with dietary EPA preferentially incorporated. In the context of a monounsaturated fatty acid-rich diet, ALA enrichment did not enhance LDL oxidizability, whereas the effects of EPA and DHA on ex vivo LDL oxidation were inconsistent, possibly in part due to further changes in LDL fatty acid composition.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedLipoproteins, LDLAdolescentAdultalpha-Linolenic AcidAntioxidantsDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFatty Acids, Omega-3FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxidation-ReductionPlant Oilsalpha-Linolenic AcidAntioxidantsDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFatty Acids, Omega-3Lipoproteins, LDLPlant OilsRapeseed OilTocopherols

Identifiers

PMID16969378
OpenAlexW2035230605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.