Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16666061›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology1988

Cytoplasmic distribution of heat shock proteins in soybean.

M A Mansfield, J L Key

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M A MansfieldDepartment of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
J L Key
University of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous analyses of the distribution of heat shock (hs) proteins in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr., var Wayne) have demonstrated that a fraction of the low molecular weight hs protein associates with ribosomes during hs. To more specifically characterize the nature of this association, isokinetic centrifugation of ribosomes through sucrose gradients was used to separate monosomes from polysomes. The present analysis demonstrated that hs proteins were bound to polysomes but not monosomes. Treatment of polysomes with puromycin, K(+), and Mg(2+), which caused dissociation of ribosomes into 40S and 60S subunits, also caused dissociation of the hs proteins. Using the procedure of Nover et al. (1983, Mol. Cell Biol, 3: 1628-1655), a hs granule fraction was also isolated. As in tomato cells, hs granules from soybean seedlings contained the low molecular weight hs proteins as a primary component and a number of other non-hs proteins of relative molecular mass 30 to 40 kilodaltons and 70 to 90 kilodaltons. On metrizamide gradients they exhibited a buoyant density of 1.20 to 1.21 grams per cubic centimeter, typical of ribonucleoprotein particles. Heat shock granules were characterized as unique cytoplasmic particles based on protein composition and buoyant density. Isopycnic centrifugation of ribosome preparations demonstrated that they contained hs granules, but the hs proteins bound to polysomes were not released by KCI/EDTA treatment. Thus, the polysome-bound hs proteins and the granule-bound hs proteins appear to represent two distinct populations of hs proteins in the cytoplasm. Heat shock granules were not distinguishable from ribosomes at the level of resolution used in transmission electron microscopy.

Identifiers

PMID16666061
PMCPMC1054658
OpenAlexW2086825463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.