Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16495449›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2006

Umami responses in mouse taste cells indicate more than one receptor.

Yutaka Maruyama, Elizabeth Pereira, Robert F Margolskee, Nirupa Chaudhari, Stephen D Roper

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Noncanonical Taste Transduction of Sugars Elicits Responses in a Dedicated Subset of Gustatory Afferent Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Taste Receptor Signaling.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sensing Senses: Optical Biosensors to Study Gustation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetics of Amino Acid Taste and Appetite.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yutaka MaruyamaDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136, USA.
Elizabeth Pereira
Robert F Margolskee
Nirupa Chaudhari
Stephen D Roper
University of Miami · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics · RU

Funding

SIGNALING IN TASTE CELLSR01DC006308 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CHAUDHARI, NIRUPA · 2005 to 2020
$4.9M
CHEMOSENSORY TRANSDUCTION IN TASTE CELLSR01DC000374 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ROPER, STEPHEN D. · 1989 to 2012
$4.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000374NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006308PHS HHS R01 000374PHS HHS R01 003155PHS HHS R01 006308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of gustatory receptors have been proposed to underlie umami, the taste of L-glutamate, and certain other amino acids and nucleotides. However, the response profiles of these cloned receptors have not been validated against responses recorded from taste receptor cells that are the native detectors of umami taste. We investigated umami taste responses in mouse circumvallate taste buds in an intact slice preparation, using confocal calcium imaging. Approximately 5% of taste cells selectively responded to L-glutamate when it was focally applied to the apical chemosensitive tips of receptor cells. The concentration-response range for L-glutamate fell approximately within the physiologically relevant range for taste behavior in mice, namely 10 mm and above. Inosine monophosphate enhanced taste cell responses to L-glutamate, a characteristic feature of umami taste. Using pharmacological agents, ion substitution, and immunostaining, we showed that intracellular pathways downstream of receptor activation involve phospholipase C beta2. Each of the above features matches those predicted by studies of cloned and expressed receptors. However, the ligand specificity of each of the proposed umami receptors [taste metabotropic glutamate receptor 4, truncated metabotropic glutamate receptor 1, or taste receptor 1 (T1R1) and T1R3 dimers], taken alone, did not appear to explain the taste responses observed in mouse taste cells. Furthermore, umami responses were still observed in mutant mice lacking T1R3. A full explanation of umami taste transduction may involve novel combinations of the proposed receptors and/or as-yet-undiscovered taste receptors.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium SignalingCells, CulturedDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlutamic AcidIsoenzymesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhospholipase C betaReceptors, Cell SurfaceTasteTaste BudsType C PhospholipasesGlutamic AcidIsoenzymesPhospholipase C betaPlcb2 protein, mouseReceptors, Cell SurfaceType C Phospholipases

Identifiers

PMID16495449
PMCPMC3717266
OpenAlexW1980490390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.