Trial reportJAMA2005

High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial.

Terje R Pedersen, Ole Faergeman, John J P Kastelein, Anders G Olsson, Matti J Tikkanen, Ingar Holme, Mogens Lytken Larsen, Fredrik S Bendiksen, Christina Lindahl, Michael Szarek and 2 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2005. The graph read 6 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. An erratum has been issued. It reports registered trial NCT00159835. Cited by 396 papers, 25 of them syntheses that pooled it.

6numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
396citing papers in PubMed, 25 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Cardiovascular eventscomparator not stated · dyslipidemia, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.890.78 to 1.01P = .07
A major coronary event occurred in 463 simvastatin patients (10.4%) and in 411 atorvastatin patients (9.3%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.01; P = .07).
All-cause mortalitycomparator not stated · dyslipidemia, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.980.85 to 1.13P = .81
Death from any cause occurred in 374 (8.4%) in the simvastatin group and 366 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin group (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85-1.13; P = .81).
Cardiovascular eventscomparator not stated · dyslipidemia, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.830.71 to 0.98P = .02
Nonfatal acute MI occurred in 321 (7.2%) and 267 (6.0%) in the 2 groups (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98; P = .02), but no differences were seen in the 2 other components of the primary end point.
Cardiovascular eventscomparator not stated · dyslipidemia, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.870.77 to 0.98P = .02
Major cardiovascular events occurred in 608 and 533 in the 2 groups, respectively (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P = .02).
Cardiovascular eventscomparator not stated · dyslipidemia, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.920.73 to 1.15P = .47
Noncardiovascular death occurred in 156 (3.5%) and 143 (3.2%) in the 2 groups (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.73-1.15; P = .47).
Cardiovascular eventscomparator not stated · dyslipidemia, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.840.76 to 0.91P<.001
Occurrence of any coronary event was reported in 1059 simvastatin and 898 atorvastatin patients (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91; P<.001).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×cardiovascular events

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

29 readable studies in this cell: 17 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.86replicated · 12 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
HR 0.760.64 to 0.91
NCT023442907,769 enrolled · 2015
HR 0.640.48 to 0.84
HR 0.880.69 to 1.11
NCT03944512102 enrolled · 2019
RR 0.670.37 to 1.19

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Statins×all-cause mortality

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

13 readable studies in this cell: 3 favour the treatment, 8 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 3 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT023442907,769 enrolled · 2015
HR 0.880.70 to 1.12
HR 1.000.90 to 1.12
NCT03944512102 enrolled · 2019
RR 0.670.37 to 1.19
RR 0.990.89 to 1.11

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00159835 phase4completed

Atorvastatin Compared With Simvastatin In The Prevention of CHD Morbidity And Mortality In Patients With CHD

Ran1999Enrolled8,600Registered outcomes2Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsAtorvastatin, simvastatin
Open the trial in the graph
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

396 citing papers in PubMed, 25 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2022 · on this map
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Residual inflammatory risk after contemporary lipid lowering therapy.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2020
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Impact of Lipid-Lowering Therapy on Mortality According to the Baseline Non-HDL Cholesterol Level: A Meta-Analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Pooled it
  19. Guideline
  20. Pooled it

336 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Terje R PedersenCentre for Preventive Medicine, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. t.r.pedersen@medisin.uio.no
Ole Faergeman
John J P Kastelein
Anders G Olsson
Matti J Tikkanen
Ingar Holme
Mogens Lytken Larsen
Fredrik S Bendiksen
Christina Lindahl
Michael Szarek
John Tsai
Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

contextEvidence suggests that more intensive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) than is commonly applied clinically will provide further benefit in stable coronary artery disease.

objectiveTo compare the effects of 2 strategies of lipid lowering on the risk of cardiovascular disease among patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThe IDEAL study, a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation trial conducted at 190 ambulatory cardiology care and specialist practices in northern Europe between March 1999 and March 2005 with a median follow-up of 4.8 years, which enrolled 8888 patients aged 80 years or younger with a history of acute MI.

interventionsPatients were randomly assigned to receive a high dose of atorvastatin (80 mg/d; n = 4439), or usual-dose simvastatin (20 mg/d; n = 4449).

main outcome measureOccurrence of a major coronary event, defined as coronary death, confirmed nonfatal acute MI, or cardiac arrest with resuscitation.

resultsDuring treatment, mean LDL-C levels were 104 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the simvastatin group and 81 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the atorvastatin group. A major coronary event occurred in 463 simvastatin patients (10.4%) and in 411 atorvastatin patients (9.3%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.01; P = .07). Nonfatal acute MI occurred in 321 (7.2%) and 267 (6.0%) in the 2 groups (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98; P = .02), but no differences were seen in the 2 other components of the primary end point. Major cardiovascular events occurred in 608 and 533 in the 2 groups, respectively (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P = .02). Occurrence of any coronary event was reported in 1059 simvastatin and 898 atorvastatin patients (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91; P<.001). Noncardiovascular death occurred in 156 (3.5%) and 143 (3.2%) in the 2 groups (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.73-1.15; P = .47). Death from any cause occurred in 374 (8.4%) in the simvastatin group and 366 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin group (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85-1.13; P = .81). Patients in the atorvastatin group had higher rates of drug discontinuation due to nonserious adverse events; transaminase elevation resulted in 43 (1.0%) vs 5 (0.1%) withdrawals (P<.001). Serious myopathy and rhabdomyolysis were rare in both groups.

conclusionsIn this study of patients with previous MI, intensive lowering of LDL-C did not result in a significant reduction in the primary outcome of major coronary events, but did reduce the risk of other composite secondary end points and nonfatal acute MI. There were no differences in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Patients with MI may benefit from intensive lowering of LDL-C without an increase in noncardiovascular mortality or other serious adverse reactions.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00159835.

Indexed as

AgedAtorvastatinCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLFemaleHeptanoic AcidsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesPyrrolesRiskSimvastatinAtorvastatinCholesterol, LDLHeptanoic AcidsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyrrolesSimvastatin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.