Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9990866›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)1998

Alterations of p16-pRb pathway and chromosome locus 9p21-22 in sporadic invasive breast carcinomas.

V G Gorgoulis, E N Koutroumbi, A Kotsinas, P Zacharatos, C Markopoulos, L Giannikos, V Kyriakou, Z Voulgaris, I Gogas, C Kittas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Expression of p16 and pRB in invasive breast cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel presentation of a familial pancreatic cancer syndrome.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V G GorgoulisDepartment of Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Greece.
E N Koutroumbi
A Kotsinas
P Zacharatos
C Markopoulos
L Giannikos
V Kyriakou
Z Voulgaris
I Gogas
C Kittas
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRLaiko General Hospital of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The p16-pRb pathway represents a vital cell-cycle checkpoint. In the present study we investigated the alterations of this G1-phase protein pathway using immunohistochemical and molecular methods in a series of 55 breast carcinomas and correlated the findings with clinicopathological features of the patients. Furthermore, we examined its relationship with the status of the chromosomal region 9p21-22 performing a deletion map analysis because there are indications that, in addition to CDKN2 and MTS2/p15(INK4B) tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), this area harbors other TSG(s). Aberrant expression (Ab) of p16 and pRb was observed in 26 (47%) and 16 (29%) of the carcinomas, respectively. A statistical trend pointing out an inverse relationship between p16 and pRb expression was found (p = 0.079). Analysis of the region that encodes for p16 by deletion mapping, a PCR-based methylation assay and PCR-SSCP, revealed that deletions and transcriptional silencing by methylation might represent the main mechanisms of CDKN2/p16(INK4A) inactivation in breast carcinomas. The results of deletion mapping also suggest that another TSG(s) may reside at the 9p21-22 area particularly at the D9S162 loci and that co-deletion of this putative gene with CDKN2/p16(INK4A) may play a role in breast carcinogenesis. In addition, microsatellite instability (MI), a marker of replication error phenotype (RER+), was observed with a frequency of 16% in the area examined and was inversely related with loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Interestingly, most cases with MI at the region encoding for p16 were aggregated in a subgroup of breast carcinomas with no other obvious genetic and/or epigenetic CDKN2/p16(INK4A) alterations. We speculate that there is an additional mechanism of CDKN2/p16(INK4A) inactivation. The relationship of p16 protein level pRb, status, the p16-pRb combined immunoprofiles, and the microsatellite alterations detected at the 9p21-22 locus with the patients' clinicopathological parameters revealed two significant correlations: one between normal pRb expression and lymph node involvement (p = 0.0263), and the other between microsatellite alterations (LOH and or MI) and tumor size (p = 9.2 x 10(-3)). In view of the heterogenous nature of breast cancer, we suggest that in a significant proportion of breast carcinomas, deregulation of the p16-pRb pathway in association with another, as-yet unidentified, TSG(s) of the 9p21-22 region may play a role in initiating or progressing the oncogenic procedure, while in other subgroups, alternative molecules may play this role.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastChromosome MappingCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16FemaleGene DeletionGenes, Tumor SuppressorHumansImmunohistochemistryLoss of HeterozygosityMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Neoplasm ProteinsRetinoblastoma Protein

Identifiers

PMID9990866
PMCPMC2230392
OpenAlexW155967121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.