Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9990053›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1999

Triplet repeats form secondary structures that escape DNA repair in yeast.

H Moore, P W Greenwell, C P Liu, N Arnheim, T D Petes

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recent Advances in DNA Nanomaterials.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Huntington disease update: new insights into the role of repeat instability in disease pathogenesis.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The G-rich Repeats inGenetics · 2018
    Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H MooreDepartment of Biology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.
P W Greenwell
C P Liu
N Arnheim
T D Petes

Funding

GENETIC &MOLECULAR STUDIES OF HUMAN &MOUSE RDNAR01GM036745 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARNHEIM, NORMAN, CALABRESE, PETER PAUL · 1985 to 2017
$8.5M
RECOMBINATION IN YEASTR01GM024110 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PETES, THOMAS · 1985 to 2015
$6.1M
GENETICS STUDIES USING SPERM TYPINGR37GM036745 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARNHEIM, NORMAN · 1992 to 2001
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM24110NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM024110NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036745NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM036745NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM36745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several human neurodegenerative diseases result from expansion of CTG/CAG or CGG/CCG triplet repeats. The finding that single-stranded CNG repeats form hairpin-like structures in vitro has led to the hypothesis that DNA secondary structure formation is an important component of the expansion mechanism. We show that single-stranded DNA loops containing 10 CTG/CAG or CGG/CCG repeats are inefficiently repaired during meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Comparisons of the repair of DNA loops with palindromic and nonpalindromic sequences suggest that this inefficient repair reflects the ability of these sequences to form hairpin structures in vivo.

Indexed as

DNA RepairNucleic Acid ConformationTrinucleotide RepeatsBase SequenceDiploidyDNA, FungalHaploidyHumansMeiosisMolecular Sequence DataNeurodegenerative DiseasesPlasmidsRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID9990053
PMCPMC15496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.