Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9987465›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of public health1999

Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the treatwell 5-a-day study.

G Sorensen, A Stoddard, K Peterson, N Cohen, M K Hunt, E Stein, R Palombo, R Lederman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of public health, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04072757 (Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04072757 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorBETH COMERFORDRan2017 to 2019Enrolled58ConditionsObesityArmsIntervention Group, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Healthy food procurement and nutrition standards in public facilities: evidence synthesis and consensus policy recommendations.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Healthy food procurement policies and their impact.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Pooled it
  8. Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

G SorensenDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Control, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA. glorian_sorensen@dfci.harvard.edu
A Stoddard
K Peterson
N Cohen
M K Hunt
E Stein
R Palombo
R Lederman

Funding

FIVE-A-DAY WORKSITE NUTRITION INTERVENTIONR01CA059728 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 1993 to 1996
–
NCI NIH HHS 5 R01 CA59728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe report on the results of the Treatwell 5-a-Day study, a worksite intervention aimed at increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables.

methodsTwenty-two worksites were randomly assigned to 3 groups: (1) a minimal intervention control group, (2) a worksite intervention, and (3) a worksite-plus-family intervention. The interventions used community-organizing strategies and were structured to target multiple levels of influence, following a socioecological model. Data were collected by self-administered employee surveys before and after the intervention; the response rate was 87% (n = 1359) at baseline and 76% (n = 1306) at follow-up. A process tracking system was used to document intervention delivery.

resultsAfter control for worksite, gender, education, occupation, race/ethnicity, and living situation, total fruit and vegetable intake increased by 19% in the worksite-plus-family group, 7% in the worksite intervention group and 0% in the control group (P = .05). These changes reflect a one half serving increase among workers in the worksite-plus-family group compared with the control group (P = .018).

conclusionsThe worksite-plus-family intervention was more successful in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption than was the worksite intervention. Worksite interventions involving family members appear to be a promising strategy for influencing workers' dietary habits.

Indexed as

DietFamilyFruitVegetablesWorkplaceAdultBostonFeeding BehaviorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleNutritional SciencesOccupational Health Services

Identifiers

PMID9987465
PMCPMC1508509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.