Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9986812›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1999

Serologic testing for human granulocytic ehrlichiosis at a national referral center.

J A Comer, W L Nicholson, J G Olson, J E Childs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AcuteOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. High Seroprevalence ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  5. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Co-circulating microorganisms in questing Ixodes scapularis nymphs in Maryland.Journal of vector ecology : journal of the Society for Vector Ecology · 2007
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis, Missouri.Emerging infectious diseases · 2003
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J A ComerViral and Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, National Center for Infectious Diseases, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. jncO@cdc.gov
W L Nicholson
J G Olson
J E Childs
National Center for Infectious Diseases · USUnited States Department of Health and Human Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was used to identify patients with antibodies reactive to the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent. Serum samples collected from clinically ill individuals were submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by physicians via state health departments from throughout the United States and tested against a panel of ehrlichial and rickettsial pathogens. Antibodies reactive to the HGE agent were detected in 142 (8.9%) of 1,602 individuals tested. There were 19 confirmed and 59 probable (n = 78) cases of HGE as defined by seroconversion or a fourfold or higher titer to the HGE agent than to the Ehrlichia chaffeensis antigens. The average age of patients with HGE was 57 years, and males accounted for 53 (68%) of the patients. Cases of HGE occurred in 21 states; 47 (60%) of the cases occurred in Connecticut (n = 14), New York (n = 18), and Wisconsin (n = 15). Onset of HGE was identified from April through December, with cases peaking in June and July. The earliest confirmed cases of HGE occurred in 1987 in Wisconsin and 1988 in Florida. No fatalities were reported among the 78 patients with confirmed or probable HGE. Reactivity to the HGE agent and to either Coxiella burnetii, Rickettsia rickettsii, or Rickettsia typhi was infrequent; however, 74 (52%) of the 142 individuals who were positive for HGE had at least one serum sample that also reacted to the E. chaffeensis antigen. Thirty-four persons with confirmed or probable human monocytic ehrlichiosis due to E. chaffeensis also had antibodies to the HGE agent in at least one serum sample. The specific etiologic agent for 30 patients was not ascribed because of similarity of titers to both ehrlichial antigens. The use of both antigens may be required to correctly diagnose most cases of human ehrlichiosis, especially in geographic regions where both the HGE agent and E. chaffeensis occur.

Indexed as

Ehrlichia chaffeensisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.ChildChild, PreschoolDemographyEhrlichiosisFemaleGranulocytesHumansMaleAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID9986812
PMCPMC84468
OpenAlexW2162655723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.