ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences1999
Relationship of portal pressure and colorectal vasculopathy in patients with cirrhosis.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spontaneous bleeding or thrombosis in cirrhosis: What should be feared the most?World journal of hepatology · 2015Article
- Portal hypertensive colopathy is associated with portal hypertension severity in cirrhotic patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We studied the relationship between portal pressure and colorectal mucosal vascular lesions in cirrhotics and the effectiveness of drug therapy in treating these lesions. Colonoscopy and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) studies were performed in 21 cirrhotics. Oral spironolactone plus transdermal nitroglycerin were given to patients who had diffuse mucosal cherry-red spots and/or rectal varices. The colonoscopy and HVPG determinations were repeated after four weeks. Colonoscopic findings included vascular ectasias in 13 patients (62%), diffuse cherry-red spots in the rectum in five patients (24%), and rectal varices in eight patients (38%). Overall, colorectal mucosal vascular lesions were found in 16 cirrhotics (76%). These findings were not found in 21 age- and sex-matched noncirrhotic controls. Vascular ectasias appeared without relationship to the HVPG. Patients with diffuse cherry-red spots (N = 5, 22.4+/-3.4 mm Hg) had a significantly higher HVPG than those without (N = 16, 16.6+/-3.3 mm Hg, P < 0.01). However, no significant difference was found in HVPG between patients with rectal varices (N = 8, 19.4+/-4.6 mm Hg) and patients without rectal varices (N = 13, 17.2+/-3.8 mm Hg). After four weeks of drug therapy, diffuse cherry-red spots became less obvious when the HVPG decreased more than 20%. Rectal varices did not change their appearance with HVPG reduction. We found that colorectal vascular lesions are common in cirrhotics. Diffuse cherry-red spots are probably dependent on elevated portal pressure, but vascular ectasias and rectal varices are not related to the degree of portal pressure. Chronic drug therapy with reduction of portal pressure improves colonoscopic findings such as diffuse cherry-red spots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.