ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences1999
The utilization of colon transit scintigraphy in the diagnostic algorithm for patients with chronic constipation.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of laxative use upon symptoms in patients with proven slow transit constipation.BMC gastroenterology · 2011Article
- Gastrointestinal transit in children with chronic idiopathic constipation.Pediatric surgery international · 2009Article
- Standard medical therapies do not alter colonic transit time in children with treatment-resistant slow-transit constipation.Pediatric surgery international · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a retrospective utilization study covering a four-year period to determine how physicians familiar with colon transit scintigraphy (CTS) use it to manage patients with chronic constipation. Following CTS, there was a change is both frequency and likelihood of diagnosis. The diagnosis was changed in 51% of patients-37% of those considered to have slow transit constipation (STC) before CTS, 43% with obstructed defecation, and 64% with functional bowel disease (FBD). CTS increased the diagnostic likelihood in all groups. Of patients with the diagnosis of STC, 16% were considered "almost certain" before CTS while 83% were considered "almost certain" after CTS. For FBD comparable percentages were 13% and 62%. CTS may play a major role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with chronic constipation, both altering diagnosis and increasing diagnostic certainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.