ReviewDrug safety1999
Comparative tolerability of erythromycin and newer macrolide antibacterials in paediatric patients.
Review in Drug safety, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-surgical periodontal therapy supplemented with systemically administered azithromycin: a systematic review of RCTs.Clinical oral investigations · 2015Pooled it
- No clinically significant effect of erythromycin or azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in healthy male volunteers.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2003Trial
- Advances in the Medical Management of Pediatric Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Genetic Variations and Antibiotic-Related Adverse Events.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Drug-Induced Hepatitis in an Adolescent During Concomitant Use of Azithromycin and Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023Article
- Risk of Mycoplasma pneumoniae-related hepatitis in MP pneumonia pediatric patients: a predictive model construction and assessment.BMC pediatrics · 2021Article
- Ototoxicity of Non-aminoglycoside Antibiotics.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Liver transplantation for azithromycin-induced severe liver injury.Korean journal of transplantation · 2020Article
- Drug-Induced Small Bowel Injury: a Challenging and Often Forgotten Clinical Condition.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019Review
- Pathogenesis and Treatment of Neurologic Diseases Associated WithFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
- Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy or azithromycin-induced intrahepatic cholestasis: A case report.Medicine · 2017Article
- Azithromycin-induced cholestatic hepatitis.Oxford medical case reports · 2017Article
- Antibiotic-Induced Liver Injury in Paediatric Outpatients: A Case-Control Study in Primary Care Databases.Drug safety · 2017Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Azithromycin as an Adjunctive Therapy to Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Review
- Antibacterial and immunomodulatory properties of azithromycin treatment implications for periodontitis.Inflammopharmacology · 2013Review
- Drug use and upper gastrointestinal complications in children: a case-control study.Archives of disease in childhood · 2013Article
- Macrolides: from in vitro anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties to clinical practice in respiratory diseases.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012Review
- Neurotoxic effects associated with antibiotic use: management considerations.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Review
- Hepatic safety of antibiotics used in primary care.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2011Review
- Acute Chlamydia trachomatis respiratory infection in infants.Journal of global infectious diseases · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The macrolides are a well established group of antibacterials frequently used in general practice. The most frequently used macrolides in paediatric patients are erythromycin, a naturally occurring compound, and clarithromycin and azithromycin, recently developed macrolides. Overall adverse effect rates of 7 to 26% for erythromycin, 14 to 26% for clarithromycin, and 6 to 27% for azithromycin have been described in children. Adverse gastrointestinal effects, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and abdominal cramps, are the most common problems in children. Allergic reactions, hepatotoxicity, ototoxicity and adverse effects involving the central and peripheral nervous systems have also been observed in children. Stevens-Johnson, Schonlein-Henoch and Churg-Strauss syndromes have been rarely described in children. Treatment-related laboratory abnormalities have been recorded in 2 to 4% of erythromycin- and in 0 to 1% of both clarithromycin- and azithromycin-treated children. Elevation in liver function tests was the most common abnormality cited. Increased macrolide use in children in recent years has resulted in a growing potential for drug interactions between them and other pharmacologically active agents via the inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) microsomal enzymes. Drug interactions with theophylline, cyclosporin, carbamazepine, terfenadine and warfarin limit erythromycin use. Clarithromycin is a weak inducer of CYP and exhibits fewer drug-drug interactions than erythromycin. However, its use with theophylline, carbamazepine and terfenadine is contraindicated. In contrast, no significant interactions have been reported with azithromycin to date. Macrolides have been proven to be well tolerated in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and also in less frequent infections occurring in paediatric patients. In addition, clarithromycin and azithromycin have shown good tolerability profiles in immunocompromised paediatric patients. In conclusion, macrolides antibacterials have proven to be well tolerated in paediatric patients. Although the incidence of adverse effects is similar with the use of erythromycin and the newer macrolides, drug interactions occur significantly less when clarithromycin or azithromycin are administered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9935275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.