Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9929764›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology1999

Efficient in vivo catheter-based pericardial gene transfer mediated by adenoviral vectors.

K L March, M Woody, K Mehdi, D P Zipes, M Brantly, B C Trapnell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RNA therapeutics in cardiovascular medicine.Current opinion in cardiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Interventional Pericardiology.Current cardiology reports · 2016
    Review
  3. Gene therapy to treat cardiovascular disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2013
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Current strategies for myocardial gene delivery.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2011
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Intrapericardial therapy and diagnosis.Current cardiology reports · 2002
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

K L MarchKrannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
M Woody
K Mehdi
D P Zipes
M Brantly
B C Trapnell
Indiana University School of MedicineCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · US

Funding

SCOR IN SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATHP50HL052323 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI ZIPES, DOUGLAS · 1995 to 1999
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL52323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenoviral vectors are promising agents for a number of in vivo gene therapy applications including diseases of the heart and coronary vessels. Efficient intravascular gene transfer to specific sites has been achieved in occluded vessels, but otherwise is hampered by the effect of blood flow on localized vector uptake in the vessel wall. An alternative delivery approach to coronary arteries is the expression of diffusible gene products into the pericardial space surrounding the heart and coronary arteries. However, in vivo pericardial access is comparatively difficult and has been limited to surgical approaches. We hypothesized that efficient adenovirus-mediated gene expression in pericardial lining mesothelium could be achieved by transmyocardial vector delivery to the pericardium. To evaluate this concept, a hollow, helical-tipped penetrating catheter was used to deliver vector-containing fluid directly into the intrapericardial space. The catheter was introduced percutaneously in anesthetized mongrel dogs, advanced into the right ventricle, and the tip passed through the apical right ventricular myocardium under direct radiographic visualization until the open end of the catheter tip resided in the intrapericardial space. Adenoviral vectors expressing either nuclear-localizing beta-galactosidase, cytoplasmic luciferase, or secreted human alpha 1AT reporters (Av1nBg, Av1Lu, or Av1Aa, respectively) were instilled through the catheter into the intrapericardial space. Three days later the animals were sacrificed and reporter gene expression was evaluated in pericardium, epicardium, and multiple other tissues. In animals receiving Av1nBg, beta-galactosidase activity was evident in most of the pericardial lining endothelium, up to 100% in many areas. In animals receiving Av1Lu, luciferase reporter activity was abundant in pericardial tissues, but near-background levels were observed in other organs. In animals receiving Av1Aa, human alpha 1AT was abundant (16-29 mg/ml) in pericardial fluid, but was undetectable in serum. All animals tolerated the procedure well with no electrocardiographic changes and no clinical sequelae. These observations demonstrate highly efficient adenovirus vector delivery and gene transfer and expression in the pericardium and support the feasibility of localized gene therapy via catheter-based pericardial approaches. We suggest that the pericardial sac may serve as a sustained-release protein delivery system for the generation of desired gene products or their metabolites for diffusion into the epicardial region.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesPericardiumAdenoviridaealpha 1-AntitrypsinAnimalsbeta-GalactosidaseCatheterizationCoronary DiseaseDiffusionDogsEpitheliumExudates and TransudatesGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, ViralGenes, Reporteralpha 1-Antitrypsinbeta-GalactosidaseLuciferases

Identifiers

PMID9929764
PMCPMC6655369
OpenAlexW2039314779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.