ReviewProceedings. AMIA Symposium1998
Bioinformatics in support of molecular medicine.
Review in Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic Studies of Malaria: a Paradigm for Investigation of Systemic Host-Pathogen Interactions.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2018Review
- Nanoinformatics: developing new computing applications for nanomedicine.Computing in science & engineering · 2012Article
- Rise and demise of bioinformatics? Promise and progress.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Re-identification of DNA through an automated linkage process.Proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2001Article
- Training multidisciplinary biomedical informatics students: three years of experience.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
- A longitudinal social network analysis of the editorial boards of medical informatics and bioinformatics journals.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
- An evaluation of the current state of genomic data privacy protection technology and a roadmap for the future.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
- Bioinformatics and medical informatics: collaborations on the road to genomic medicine?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Bioinformatics studies two important information flows in modern biology. The first is the flow of genetic information from the DNA of an individual organism up to the characteristics of a population of such organisms (with an eventual passage of information back to the genetic pool, as encoded within DNA). The second is the flow of experimental information from observed biological phenomena to models that explain them, and then to new experiments in order to test these models. The discipline of bioinformatics has its roots in a number of activities, including the organization of DNA sequence and protein three-dimensional structural data collections in the 1960's and 1970's. It has become a booming academic and industrial enterprise with the introduction of biological experiments that rapidly produce massive amounts of data (such as the multiple genome sequencing projects, the large scale analysis of gene expression, and the large scale analysis of protein-protein interactions). Basic biological science has always had an impact on clinical medicine (and clinical medical information systems), and is creating a new generation of epidemiologic, diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment modalities. Bioinformatics efforts that appear to be wholly geared towards basic science are likely to become relevant to clinical informatics in the coming decade. For example, DNA sequence information and sequence annotations will appear in the medical chart with increasing frequency. The algorithms developed for research in bioinformatics will soon become part of clinical information systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9929182PMC2232090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.