ArticleGenetics1999
Isolation and characterization of Drosophila retinal degeneration B suppressors.
Article in Genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Negative regulation of the novel norpA(P24) suppressor, diehard4, in the endo-lysosomal trafficking underlies photoreceptor cell degeneration.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
- Phototransduction and retinal degeneration in Drosophila.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2007Review
- Novel dominant rhodopsin mutation triggers two mechanisms of retinal degeneration and photoreceptor desensitization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2004Article
- A neuronal-specific mammalian homolog of the Drosophila retinal degeneration B gene with expression restricted to the retina and dentate gyrus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Drosophila retinal degeneration B protein (RdgB) is a novel integral membrane phosphatidylinositol transfer protein required for photoreceptor cell viability and light response. We isolated one intragenic suppressor (rdgBsu100) and four autosomal suppressors of the hypomorphic rdgBKS222 retinal degeneration phenotype. The rdgBsu100 suppressor dramatically slowed rdgBKS222's photoreceptor degeneration without significantly improving the electroretinogram (ERG) light response. One autosomal recessive suppressor [su(rdgB)69] significantly slowed rdgBKS222 retinal degeneration and restored the ERG light response near to that of the wild type. Unlike all the previously characterized rdgB suppressors, the four new autosomal suppressors do not affect the ERG light response in rdgB+ flies. Only Su(rdgB)116 exhibited a mutant phenotype in a rdgB+ background, which was smaller R1-6 rhabdomeres. We also examined the extent to which two previously identified visual transduction mutations suppressed rdgB retinal degeneration. Absence of one of the light-activated calcium channels (trpCM) slowed the onset of rdgB-dependent degeneration. However, loss of protein kinase C (inaC209), which blocks photoreceptor cell deactivation, desensitization, and light adaptation, failed to suppress rdgB degeneration under normal light conditions. This demonstrates that TRP activity, but not INAC, is required for rapid rdgB-dependent degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.