Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9914879›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in oncology1999

Developing recombinant and synthetic vaccines for the treatment of melanoma.

N P Restifo, S A Rosenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in oncology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The future of interleukin-2: enhancing therapeutic anticancer vaccines.The cancer journal from Scientific American · 2000
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Hierarchy, tolerance, and dominance in the antitumor T-cell response.Journal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N P RestifoNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1502, USA.
S A Rosenberg
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZ01BC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RESTIFO, NICHOLAS P · 2006 to 2008
$6.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010763Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop new vaccines for the treatment of patients with cancer, target antigens presented on tumor cell surfaces have been cloned. Many of these antigens are non-mutated differentiation antigens and are expressed by virtually all melanomas, making them attractive components for a widely efficacious melanoma vaccine. These antigens are also expressed by melanocytes, however, and are likely to be subject to immune tolerance. A central challenge for tumor immunologists has thus been the breaking of tolerance to cancer antigens. We review recent clinical trials using experimental cancer vaccines, including recent evidence that therapeutic vaccines can induce objective responses in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. We focus on the foundations of these approaches in new experimental animal models designed to test novel vaccines and report on what these new models predict for the future development of therapeutic vaccines for cancer.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdoptive TransferAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalHumansMelanomaTumor EscapeVaccines, SyntheticAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID9914879
PMCPMC1950783
OpenAlexW1988059045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.