ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1999
Comparison of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing of Moraxella catarrhalis strains.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of restriction enzymes for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of Moraxella catarrhalis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
- Diversity of swine Bordetella bronchiseptica isolates evaluated by RAPD analysis and PFGE.Journal of veterinary science · 2007Article
- Molecular characterization of Haemophilus ducreyi isolates from different geographical locations.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2006Article
- Moraxella catarrhalis: from emerging to established pathogen.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2002Review
- Conservation of outer membrane protein E among strains of Moraxella catarrhalis.Infection and immunity · 2001Article
- Bacterial infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 2000: a state-of-the-art review.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for the analysis of 13 Moraxella catarrhalis isolates, 11 successive strains isolated from sputa of five children and 2 isolates obtained the same day from twins, were compared. RAPD and PFGE both yielded nine types from the 13 isolates, showing a chronic colonization with one strain in three patients and a successive colonization with different strains in two patients. The promising results obtained with RAPD should be confirmed with a larger number of strains, but RAPD seems as suitable as PFGE for the typing of M. catarrhalis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.