Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9880475›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews1999

Candida glabrata: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans.

P L Fidel, J A Vazquez, J D Sobel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 357 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
357citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

357 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 916 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Journal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Clinical case reports · 2026
    Article
  10. Treatment ofAJOG global reports · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multidistrict invasiveFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Bixin fromACS omega · 2025
    Article
  18. ACG case reports journal · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

297 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P L FidelDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA. pfidel@lsumc.edu
J A Vazquez
J D Sobel
Wayne State University · USLouisiana State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, Candida glabrata was considered a relatively nonpathogenic commensal fungal organism of human mucosal tissues. However, with the increased use of immunosuppressive agents, mucosal and systemic infections caused by C. glabrata have increased significantly, especially in the human immunodeficiency virus-infected population. A major obstacle in C. glabrata infections is their innate resistance to azole antimycotic therapy, which is very effective in treating infections caused by other Candida species. Candida glabrata, formerly known as Torulopsis glabrata, contrasts with other Candida species in its nondimorphic blastoconidial morphology and haploid genome. C. glabrata currently ranks second or third as the causative agent of superficial (oral, esophageal, vaginal, or urinary) or systemic candidal infections, which are often nosocomial. Currently, however, there are few recognized virulence factors of C. glabrata and little is known about the host defense mechanisms that protect against infection. Two established animal models (systemic and vaginal) have been established to study treatment, pathogenesis, and immunity. Treatment of C. glabrata infections can include azoles but often requires amphotericin B or flucytosine. This review summarizes all known clinical and experimental information about C. glabrata infections with comparisons to C. albicans as a means of contrasting the two species commonly observed and emphasizing the many recognized differences.

Indexed as

AnimalsCandidaCandida albicansCandidiasisFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID9880475
PMCPMC88907
OpenAlexW2143839871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.