Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9880474›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews1999

Current and emerging azole antifungal agents.

D J Sheehan, C A Hitchcock, C M Sibley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 275 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
275citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

275 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Topical azole treatments for otomycosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. α-1,3-Glucan-Driven Remodeling of the Conidial Cell Wall in anJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Drug susceptibility ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

215 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D J SheehanPfizer Pharmaceuticals Group, Pfizer Inc., New York, New York 10017-5755, USA. sheehd@pfizer.com
C A Hitchcock
C M Sibley
Pfizer (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major developments in research into the azole class of antifungal agents during the 1990s have provided expanded options for the treatment of many opportunistic and endemic fungal infections. Fluconazole and itraconazole have proved to be safer than both amphotericin B and ketoconazole. Despite these advances, serious fungal infections remain difficult to treat, and resistance to the available drugs is emerging. This review describes present and future uses of the currently available azole antifungal agents in the treatment of systemic and superficial fungal infections and provides a brief overview of the current status of in vitro susceptibility testing and the growing problem of clinical resistance to the azoles. Use of the currently available azoles in combination with other antifungal agents with different mechanisms of action is likely to provide enhanced efficacy. Detailed information on some of the second-generation triazoles being developed to provide extended coverage of opportunistic, endemic, and emerging fungal pathogens, as well as those in which resistance to older agents is becoming problematic, is provided.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsAzolesAnimalsDrug DesignHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycosesAntifungal AgentsAzoles

Identifiers

PMID9880474
PMCPMC88906
OpenAlexW2157428610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.