Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9875017›Full record

SynthesisArchives of disease in childhood1998

Systematic review of the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection.

T Fahey, N Stocks, T Thomas

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of disease in childhood, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Common cold.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Common cold.BMJ clinical evidence · 2008
    Pooled it
  5. The natural history of acute cough in children aged 0 to 4 years in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Modelling consultation rates in infancy: influence of maternal and infant characteristics, feeding type and consultation history.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Disappearance of Respiratory Viruses in Children during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T FaheyDivision of Primary Care, University of Bristol, UK. tom.fahey@bris.ac.uk
N Stocks
T Thomas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the risks and benefits of antibiotic treatment in children with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI).

designQuantitative systematic review of randomised trials that compare antibiotic treatment with placebo. DATA SOURCES: Twelve trials retrieved from a systematic search (electronic databases, contact with authors, contact with drug manufacturers, reference lists); no restriction on language.

main outcome measuresThe proportion of children in whom the clinical outcome was worse or unchanged; the proportion of children who suffered complications or progression of illness; the proportion of children who had side effects.

results1699 children were randomised in six trials that contributed to the meta-analysis. Six trials were not used in the meta-analysis because of different outcomes or incomplete data. Clinical outcome was not improved by antibiotic treatment (relative risk 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 1.13), neither was the proportion of children suffering from complications or progression of illness (relative risk 0.71, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.12). Complications from URTI in the five trials that reported this outcome was low (range 2-15%). Antibiotic treatment was not associated with an increase in side effects compared with placebo (relative risk 0.8, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.21).

conclusionsIn view of the lack of efficacy and low complication rates, antibiotic treatment of children with URTI is not supported by current evidence from randomised trials.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Tract InfectionsRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID9875017
PMCPMC1717698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.